Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microfixation techniques in pediatric craniomaxillofacial surgery.

A M Sadove1, B L Eppley

  • 1Craniofacial Program, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis 46202-5200.

Annals of Plastic Surgery
|July 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Microfixation offers enhanced stability for pediatric craniofacial surgery. This technique is easier to apply and adjust, proving effective in a series of 65 children.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pediatric plastic surgery revisited.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Bipedicle fasciocutaneous flaps for inframalleolar vascular graft coverage at the ankle/foot.

Annals of plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Free fibular flap reconstruction in mandibular osteopetrosis.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2001
Same author

Re: Tension forces in relation to LeFort III osteotomies: an anatomical study.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2001
Same author

Alloplastic tumor of the palate: view from the operating room.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2001
Same author

Re: Periodontal evaluation in patients undergoing maxillary expansion.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2001

Area of Science:

  • Craniofacial Surgery
  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Biomaterials Engineering

Background:

  • Infantile and pediatric craniofacial skeletons present unique surgical challenges.
  • Traditional fixation methods may not be optimal for small, developing bone structures.
  • Microfixation has emerged as a specialized technique for pediatric craniofacial applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present microfixation as a technical advancement for pediatric craniofacial surgery.
  • To compare the advantages and technical aspects of microfixation versus minifixation in small skeletal structures.
  • To demonstrate the range of applications and outcomes of microfixation in a pediatric cohort.

Main Methods:

  • Review of microfixation techniques applied to infantile and pediatric craniofacial skeletons.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of microfixation versus minifixation for smaller skeletal structures.
  • Clinical case series of 65 children undergoing microfixation procedures with over 1-year follow-up.

    • Main Results:

    • Microplates provide significant skeletal stability despite their small size.
    • Microfixation is relatively easy to apply and adjust post-placement.
    • The study demonstrated a range of successful applications in pediatric craniofacial surgery.

    Conclusions:

    • Microfixation is a valuable technical advance for pediatric craniofacial surgery.
    • The technique offers superior skeletal stability and ease of use compared to alternatives for small bone structures.
    • Clinical outcomes in a series of 65 children support the efficacy and broad applicability of microfixation.