Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Restraint to Induce Stress in Mice and Rats
Published on: December 6, 2024
Service users and staff from secure intellectual disability settings: views on three physical restraint procedures
Peter Jones1, Biza Stenfert Kroese
1South Staffordshire and Shropshire Psychology Service, Albrighton, UK. pete@pjones71.freeserve.co.uk
Abstract:
The appropriateness of and justification for physical restraint procedures in intellectual disabilities settings is an emotive issue. It creates a number of ethical dilemmas for nursing staff. This article examines the views of service users and nursing staff from secure residential facilities where restraint is used frequently. Both groups were asked to rate three videotaped restraint procedures for their acceptability. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the acceptability ratings of the methods of restraint. Service users were then interviewed about their restraint experiences. They reported feeling very angry, sad, stressed and confused and not at all happy or relaxed when being restrained. Scores indicated that participants were significantly happier and less stressed after restraint than during restraint.
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Obedience
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.
Restorative Care
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...

