Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of increasing levels of phytase on performance, prececal nutrient digestibility, intestinal mucosa physiology and immune response in broiler chickens from 1 to 21 days of age.

Poultry science·2025
Same author

Contrafreeloading and foraging-related behavior in hens differing in laying performance and phylogenetic origin.

Poultry science·2023
Same author

Dietary fiber and its role in performance, welfare, and health of pigs.

Animal health research reviews·2023
Same author

Novel <i>ex vivo</i> screening assay to preselect farm specific pre- and probiotics in pigs.

Beneficial microbes·2021
Same author

The food for feed concept. Performance of broilers fed hotel food residues.

British poultry science·2021
Same author

Effect of feeding different levels of lignocellulose on performance, nutrient digestibility, excreta dry matter, and intestinal microbiota in slow growing broilers.

Poultry science·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Separation of Avian Preovulatory Follicle Granulosa and Theca Cell Layers for Downstream Applications
05:04

Separation of Avian Preovulatory Follicle Granulosa and Theca Cell Layers for Downstream Applications

Published on: October 25, 2024

Laying hens learn to avoid feathers.

A Harlander-Matauschek1, F Wassermann, J Zentek

  • 1Department of Farm Animal Ethology and Poultry Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany. harland@uni-hohenheim.de

Poultry Science
|August 30, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Feathers treated with quinine sulfate, an unpalatable substance, reduced feather eating and feather pecking in laying hens. This suggests digestive feedback influences feather damaging behaviors.

More Related Videos

Who is Who? Non-invasive Methods to Individually Sex and Mark Altricial Chicks
08:14

Who is Who? Non-invasive Methods to Individually Sex and Mark Altricial Chicks

Published on: May 24, 2014

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings
09:32

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Published on: April 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Separation of Avian Preovulatory Follicle Granulosa and Theca Cell Layers for Downstream Applications
05:04

Separation of Avian Preovulatory Follicle Granulosa and Theca Cell Layers for Downstream Applications

Published on: October 25, 2024

Who is Who? Non-invasive Methods to Individually Sex and Mark Altricial Chicks
08:14

Who is Who? Non-invasive Methods to Individually Sex and Mark Altricial Chicks

Published on: May 24, 2014

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings
09:32

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Published on: April 1, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Animal Behavior
  • Avian Nutrition
  • Animal Welfare

Background:

  • Feather pecking and feather eating are linked in laying hens.
  • The role of digestive feedback in these behaviors is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if digestive feedback influences feather eating and feather pecking in laying hens.
  • To test the hypothesis that palatable (sucrose) and unpalatable (quinine sulfate) feather enrichment differentially affects these behaviors.

Main Methods:

  • Forty-eight laying hens were divided into groups.
  • One group received feathers soaked in sucrose solution (S), another in quinine sulfate solution (Q), and a control group (C) received no feathers.
  • Feather pecking behavior was assessed after the feeding period.

Main Results:

  • Significantly fewer quinine sulfate-treated feathers were consumed compared to sucrose-treated feathers.
  • Hens exposed to quinine sulfate feathers exhibited less severe feather pecking than sucrose or control groups.
  • Quinine sulfate acted as an aversive signal, reducing feather damage.

Conclusions:

  • Digestive feedback, specifically through taste aversion, can mitigate feather pecking and feather eating in laying hens.
  • Unpalatable substances on feathers can serve as a protective mechanism against feather damage.
  • This finding has implications for improving laying hen welfare and feather cover.