Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Biomarker evaluation and comparison using the controls as a reference population.
Ying Huang1, Margaret Sullivan Pepe
1Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-A410, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. yhuang124@gmail.com
This study introduces the "percentile value" framework as an alternative to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for evaluating continuous marker accuracy. This novel approach offers a familiar biostatistical framework and enables new biomarker evaluation techniques.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Biomarker Discovery
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Continuous marker classification accuracy is commonly assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
- Existing methods may not be intuitive or offer avenues for novel statistical developments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate the
- percentile value
- framework as an alternative to ROC analysis for continuous marker classification.
- To develop new statistical procedures for biomarker evaluation and comparison within this framework.
Main Methods:
- The
- percentile value
- framework standardizes markers using control distributions.
- Analysis focuses on standardized markers in cases, demonstrating equivalence to ROC analysis.
- Development of new statistical methods for comparing biomarkers and adjusting for covariates.
Main Results:
- The
- percentile value
- framework is shown to be equivalent to ROC analysis.
- New procedures for biomarker comparison and covariate adjustment were developed.
- Methods were illustrated using data from two cancer biomarker studies.
Conclusions:
- The
- percentile value
- framework provides a familiar and versatile alternative to ROC analysis for biomarker evaluation.
- This approach facilitates the development of advanced statistical techniques for biomarker assessment and comparison.
- The developed methods offer practical tools for analyzing biomarker performance across different populations and adjusting for confounding factors.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Controls in Experiments
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
