Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language Development01:22

Language Development

Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of telepractice on vocal turn-taking between a provider, children with cochlear implants, and caregivers: A preliminary report.

Cochlear implants international·2023
Same author

Prelinguistic Consonant Production and the Influence of Mouthing Before and After Cochlear Implantation.

Ear and hearing·2021
Same author

Story hour at a family homeless center: contribution to graduate students' preparation and confidence in preliteracy skills.

Journal of communication disorders·2021
Same author

Vocal imitation between mothers and their children with cochlear implants.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2020
Same author

Exploring in Silence: Hearing and Deaf Infants Explore Objects Differently before Cochlear Implantation.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2019
Same author

Vocal Turn-Taking Between Mothers and Their Children With Cochlear Implants.

Ear and hearing·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Managing referrals for children with receptive language delay.

Mary K Fagan1, Thomas R Montgomery

  • 1Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA. mkfagan@indiana.edu

Clinical Pediatrics
|September 2, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Children with receptive language delay may also have cognitive deficits. Receptive language scores can predict cognitive performance, suggesting early cognitive testing for at-risk children.

Area of Science:

  • Child Development
  • Neuroscience
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Receptive language (RL) delay in children is a growing concern.
  • Early identification of RL delay is crucial for intervention.
  • Understanding the link between language and cognition is vital for child development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between receptive language scores and cognitive abilities in children.
  • To identify children with receptive language delay who are at risk for cognitive deficits.
  • To propose guidelines for cognitive testing referrals in cases of receptive language delay.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of test scores from 41 children (ages 17-76 months).
  • Analysis of associations between receptive language scores and cognitive scores.

More Related Videos

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking (IPL): Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
10:11

Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking (IPL): Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism

Published on: December 14, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
11:25

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking (IPL): Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
10:11

Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking (IPL): Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism

Published on: December 14, 2012

  • Statistical examination of receptive scores as predictors of cognitive performance.
  • Main Results:

    • A positive correlation was found between mean receptive language scores and mean cognitive scores.
    • Receptive language scores significantly predicted cognitive performance.
    • Children with RL scores more than 1 standard deviation below the mean showed increased risk for cognitive deficits.

    Conclusions:

    • Receptive language delay is associated with a considerable risk of concomitant cognitive deficits.
    • Receptive language scores can serve as an indicator for potential cognitive impairments.
    • Referral for cognitive testing is recommended when receptive language standard scores fall below 85.