Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In-vitro Mutagenesis01:16

In-vitro Mutagenesis

To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.
Mouse Models of Cancer Study02:43

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of Estimating Genetic Variance in the Target Group on Reliability Metrics of the Linear Regression Validation Method Under Selection.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Handling errors in the response: Considerations for leveraging unsupervised or incomplete data for genetic evaluations" (JDS Commun. 5:675-680).

JDS communications·2026
Same author

Genetic connectedness and genotype-by-environment interaction in a maternal pig line across countries.

Journal of animal science·2026
Same author

Methods for joint genetic prediction of multiple ordinal categorical and continuous traits.

Genetics·2026
Same author

Genetic Parameter Estimation for Plasma Biomarkers Associated With Energy Reserves During Critical Physiological Stages in Sheep.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie·2025
Same author

Estimation of (co)variance components for very large datasets and complex single-step genomic models.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Improved Genome Editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery-based In Vivo Electroporation Technique for Knockout Mice Generation
09:56

Improved Genome Editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery-based In Vivo Electroporation Technique for Knockout Mice Generation

Published on: August 26, 2025

Performance of genomic selection in mice.

Andrés Legarra1, Christèle Robert-Granié, Eduardo Manfredi

  • 1INRA, UR 631, F-31326 Auzeville, France. andres.legarra@toulouse.inra.fr

Genetics
|September 2, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Genomic selection using genomewide markers offers modest gains in predictive ability across families, but limited improvements within families. This study questions its broad application in genetic evaluation.

Area of Science:

  • Animal and Plant Breeding
  • Quantitative Genetics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Genetic evaluation is crucial for selection plans in breeding.
  • Genomic selection, utilizing extensive genetic marker data, is a recent development.
  • Evidence for the performance of genomic selection is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically compare the performance of genomic selection against traditional methods.
  • To assess the impact of genomewide markers versus pedigree and phenotypic information.
  • To evaluate the utility of across- and within-family information in genetic evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of four traits in a heterogeneous mouse population (1884 individuals, 10,946 SNP markers).
  • Comparison of three selection strategies: pedigree/phenotype, genomewide markers/phenotype, and combined.

More Related Videos

Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases
12:04

Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases

Published on: April 2, 2014

Use of Freeze-thawed Embryos for High-efficiency Production of Genetically Modified Mice
06:46

Use of Freeze-thawed Embryos for High-efficiency Production of Genetically Modified Mice

Published on: April 2, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Improved Genome Editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery-based In Vivo Electroporation Technique for Knockout Mice Generation
09:56

Improved Genome Editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery-based In Vivo Electroporation Technique for Knockout Mice Generation

Published on: August 26, 2025

Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases
12:04

Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases

Published on: April 2, 2014

Use of Freeze-thawed Embryos for High-efficiency Production of Genetically Modified Mice
06:46

Use of Freeze-thawed Embryos for High-efficiency Production of Genetically Modified Mice

Published on: April 2, 2020

  • Application of linear mixed models and cross-validation techniques for predictive ability estimation.
  • Main Results:

    • Genomewide markers increased predictive ability by up to 0.22 across families and 0.03 within families.
    • Increases in accuracy of genetic value prediction were up to 0.57 (across family) and 0.14 (within family).
    • Within-family information proved more accurate than across-family information; populational linkage disequilibrium showed limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • Genomic selection shows potential for improving across-family predictions but offers minimal gains within families.
    • The effectiveness of genomic selection may be population- and family-structure dependent.
    • Populational linkage disequilibrium alone is not a fully reliable basis for genetic evaluation, raising questions about certain genomic selection applications.