Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Calculating sample size for studies with expected all-or-none nonadherence and selection bias.
Michelle D Shardell1, Samer S El-Kamary
1Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA. mshardel@epi.umaryland.edu
This study provides new sample size formulas for clinical trials anticipating nonadherence and selection bias. These formulas help researchers accurately plan studies by accounting for noncompliance and potential systematic differences in treatment groups.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Nonadherence (noncompliance) and selection bias can complicate clinical trial analysis.
- Previous work addressed increased variances due to nonadherence but assumed no selection bias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop sample size formulas for studies with expected nonadherence and selection bias.
- To extend existing methods to incorporate selection bias as systematic differences in latent adherence subgroups.
- To provide tools for accurate sample size calculations in clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Developed sample size formulas for mean differences between treatment and control groups.
- Extended prior work on nonadherence variances to include selection bias.
- Incorporated systematic differences in means and variances among adherence subgroups.
- Utilized pilot adherence data for sample size calculations.
Main Results:
- New formulas are presented for sample size calculations under nonadherence and selection bias.
- The approach accounts for increased variances and systematic differences.
- Illustrative calculations are provided for planning clinical trials.
- Formulas for normally distributed outcomes and uncertainty from pilot data are available.
Conclusions:
- The developed formulas enhance the accuracy of sample size determination in complex clinical trial scenarios.
- Accounting for both nonadherence and selection bias is crucial for robust study planning.
- The methods offer practical tools for researchers designing clinical trials.
Related Concept Videos
Sample Size Calculation
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Censoring Survival Data
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
