Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study
Published on: February 25, 2013
Time series count data models: an empirical application to traffic accidents
1Transport Studies Group, Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Epinel Way/Ashby Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, United Kingdom. m.a.quddus@lboro.ac.uk
Integer-valued autoregressive (INAR) Poisson models effectively analyze time series count data, outperforming traditional ARIMA models for low-count, disaggregated traffic accident data. These models account for serial correlation, offering a robust alternative for complex count data analysis.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Time Series Analysis
- Econometrics
Background:
- Traditional count data models (Poisson, Negative Binomial) struggle with serial correlation in time series data.
- Real-valued time series models like ARIMA may be inappropriate for non-negative integer-valued data due to normality assumptions.
- Integer-valued autoregressive (INAR) Poisson models offer a promising alternative for time series count data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate Integer-valued Autoregressive (INAR) Poisson models for analyzing traffic accident time series data in Great Britain.
- To compare the performance of INAR models against traditional Box-Jenkins real-valued models (ARIMA) for both aggregated and disaggregated traffic data.
Main Methods:
- Application of Integer-valued Autoregressive (INAR) Poisson models to time series count data of traffic accidents.
- Comparison of INAR models with Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models using aggregated (e.g., Great Britain, years) and disaggregated (e.g., zone, months) data.
- Evaluation of model performance based on coefficient estimates and goodness-of-fit metrics.
Main Results:
- For aggregated traffic accident data with high counts, INAR and ARIMA models showed similar performance.
- For disaggregated traffic accident data with low counts, INAR Poisson models significantly outperformed ARIMA models.
- INAR models demonstrate superior ability to handle serial correlation in time series count data, especially at lower count levels.
Conclusions:
- INAR Poisson models are a more appropriate and effective tool for analyzing time series count data, particularly when counts are low and serial correlation is present.
- The study highlights the limitations of traditional ARIMA models for specific types of count data, advocating for the adoption of INAR models in such scenarios.
- Further research is needed to address limitations of INAR models regarding seasonality and unobserved heterogeneity.
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Expected Frequency
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Time-Series Graph
Applications of Life Tables
