Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...
Typical Model Studies01:30

Typical Model Studies

Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

STHLM3 NorDCaP: prospective multicentre trial of Stockholm3 for active surveillance biopsy guidance.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Stockholm3-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening Study: Two-Year Follow-up.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Impact of Population-Based Pathogenic Variant Testing on Risk-Based Breast Screening Recommendations: A Secondary Analysis of the WISDOM Study.

JAMA oncology·2026
Same author

WISDOM randomized trial comparing risk-based versus annual breast cancer screening: study cohort characteristics and design.

NPJ breast cancer·2026
Same author

Biological subphenotypes in severe acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome using rapid prospective classification (SPARC) in the USA: a multicentre, observational, study.

The Lancet. Respiratory medicine·2026
Same author

Cell painting and thermal proteome profiling for inference of drug targets and mechanism of action.

Molecular systems biology·2026
Same journal

Covariance decomposition for distance based species tree estimation.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SNPio: a Python interface for population genomic data processing.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SpaHNR: a spatial domain identification method via sparse attention-based hierarchical node representation and multi-view contrastive learning.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

The C1C2: a framework for simultaneous model selection and assessment.

Martin Eklund1, Ola Spjuth, Jarl Es Wikberg

  • 1Department of Pharmaceutical Pharmacology, Uppsala University, Box 591, BMC, SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden. martin.eklund@farmbio.uu.se

BMC Bioinformatics
|September 3, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The novel C1C2 framework accurately selects and assesses predictive models, improving generalization error estimates. This method effectively handles complex datasets, outperforming traditional cross-validation for reliable model evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Machine Learning
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Concerns exist regarding the generalizability of predictive models to new data.
  • Improper model selection and assessment methods contribute to these issues.
  • The C1C2 framework is introduced for simultaneous model selection and assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel framework (C1C2) for simultaneous model selection and assessment.
  • To investigate automatic search methods (genetic algorithm, brute-force) for model choice.
  • To compare the C1C2 framework with repeated K-fold cross-validation.

Main Methods:

  • The C1C2 framework partitions data to separate model choice from assessment.
  • Automatic search methods (genetic algorithm, brute-force) were employed for model selection.
  • Penalized linear models were used, focusing on variable selection and parameter choice.

Main Results:

  • The C1C2 framework successfully identified the true model and provided accurate generalization error estimates.
  • It performed well even with highly correlated variables and low observation-to-variable ratios.
  • Compared to K-fold cross-validation, C1C2 offered similar model choice but more accurate generalization error estimates.

Conclusions:

  • The C1C2 framework effectively selects penalized linear models and assesses generalization error.
  • It is robust to issues like highly correlated variables, low sample sizes, and model assumption deviations.
  • Separating model choice and assessment data enhances generalization error estimation.