Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Protocol for Biofilm Streamer Formation in a Microfluidic Device with Micro-pillars
Published on: August 20, 2014
Saffman-Taylor streamers: mutual finger interaction in spark formation
Alejandro Luque1, Fabian Brau, Ute Ebert
1CWI, P.O. Box 94079, 1090 GB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Interacting streamers in electric fields were simulated, revealing that close spacing prevents branching and leads to uniform motion. Their shapes match the Saffman-Taylor finger, offering insights into electrical discharge dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Physics
- Plasma Physics
- Electrical Engineering
Background:
- Current theories on electrical discharges like sparks and lightning often focus on single streamers or simplified breakdown trees.
- A gap exists in understanding the complex interactions within arrays of multiple streamers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the behavior of interacting streamer discharges in a uniform electric field using a two-dimensional fluid approximation.
- To analyze how streamer spacing affects their morphology and dynamics, particularly in relation to branching.
Main Methods:
- Simulations were performed on a periodic array of interacting streamer discharges in a homogeneous electric field.
- A density or fluid approximation was used in two dimensions.
- A moving boundary approximation to the density model was discussed and compared to Hele-Shaw flows.
Main Results:
- Streamers with sufficiently small periods exhibit uniform translation without branching.
- The enhanced electric field at streamer tips approaches twice the applied field (2Einfinity) near the branching regime.
- The simulated shapes of interacting streamers in uniform motion were accurately described by the analytical Saffman-Taylor finger solution.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a model for understanding interactions in streamer arrays, moving beyond single-streamer theories.
- The connection to Saffman-Taylor flow offers a new perspective on pattern selection in moving boundary problems.
- This research contributes to a deeper comprehension of electrical breakdown phenomena and fluid dynamics.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Contact-dependent Signaling
Gap Junctions
In animal cells, gap junctions are formed...
Generation of Straight or Branched Actin Filaments
Arp2/3 Complex
Arp2/3 complex is a seven-subunit complex consisting of two proteins similar to actin- Arp2 and Arp3, and five other subunits that help keep Arp2 and Arp3 inactive. When required, the complex is...
Formation of Higher-order Actin Filaments
The high-order actin networks...

