Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development

Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development

The preoperational stage, the second of Jean Piaget's four stages of cognitive development, spans approximately ages 2 to 7 and is characterized by the emergence of symbolic thinking. During this stage, children use language, images, and symbols to represent objects and concepts, enabling them to engage in imaginative and pretend play. This symbolic thinking supports children's ability to perform make-believe actions, such as imagining a broom as a horse or their hand as a phone, blending...

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development

Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development

During Piaget's concrete operational stage, from ages 7 to 11, children exhibit a marked increase in logical thinking skills, specifically in relation to tangible, real-world events. This stage is characterized by the development of several essential cognitive concepts, including conservation, reversibility, and classification, all of which support the child's evolving capacity for structured thought.
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the concrete...

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.

Reasoning

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

"Whoooo said that?": responses of captive owls (<i>Strigiformes</i>) to the voices of familiar caregivers.

PeerJ·2026

Same author

Purr-ceiving feelings: domestic cats respond to intraspecific cues of emotion.

PeerJ·2026

Same author

Brains over brawn? Brown bears (Ursus arctos) demonstrate behavioral flexibility on a multi-access box and other tasks.

Acta psychologica·2026

Same author

Crashing the tea party: Imagining alternative explanations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026

Same author

Introduction to the special issue honoring Suzanne MacDonald: Truly comparative and incomparable.

Learning & behavior·2026

Same author

Looking to the Future of Primatology: Introduction to the Special Issue on Student-Led Research.

American journal of primatology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

Do chimpanzees know what others can and cannot do? Reasoning about 'capability'.

Jennifer Vonk¹, Francys Subiaul

¹Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Gulf Coast, 730 East Beach Blvd, Long Beach, MS 39560, USA. jenvonk@gmail.com

Animal Cognition

|September 4, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Chimpanzees did not reliably predict which human could deliver food, focusing on irrelevant cues like proximity instead of limb visibility. This suggests a potential failure in their causal reasoning about physical actions.

More Related Videos

A Modified Mirror Test as a Visual Guide for the Self-awareness Trait in Wild Antarctica Penguins, Pygoscelis adeliae

A Modified Mirror Test as a Visual Guide for the Self-awareness Trait in Wild Antarctica Penguins, Pygoscelis adeliae

Published on: July 8, 2025

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

A Modified Mirror Test as a Visual Guide for the Self-awareness Trait in Wild Antarctica Penguins, Pygoscelis adeliae

A Modified Mirror Test as a Visual Guide for the Self-awareness Trait in Wild Antarctica Penguins, Pygoscelis adeliae

Published on: July 8, 2025

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Primate Behavior
Comparative Psychology

Background:

Research explores nonhuman primate understanding of physical causality.
Limited studies investigate primate comprehension of others' physical capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

To test chimpanzees' ability to predict which human experimenter could perform a physical task.
To assess if chimpanzees use limb visibility to infer action capabilities.

Main Methods:

Seven chimpanzees were presented with two human experimenters in varying conditions (e.g., 'floor' vs. 'lap' task).
Experimenters' visibility (legs or arms) and proximity were manipulated.
Chimpanzees' food-begging preferences were recorded.

Main Results:

Chimpanzees consistently preferred the experimenter with visible arms (ANV) regardless of the task.
Performance was influenced by irrelevant cues like proximity and occlusion, not limb visibility.
When these cues were controlled, performance dropped to chance levels.

Conclusions:

Chimpanzees may not spontaneously use limb visibility to predict human physical task performance.
Findings suggest a potential deficit in causal reasoning regarding the use of limbs for physical acts.
Further research is needed to understand the nuances of primate causal inference.