Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Flow Cytometry01:23

Flow Cytometry

The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multivalent Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions Probed by Composition-Gradient Multiangle Light Scattering.

ACS omega·2024
Same author

Molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils: comparison of analytical methodologies.

RSC advances·2022
Same author

Opalescence Measurements: Improvements in Fundamental Knowledge, Identifying Sources of Analytical Biases, and Advanced Applications for the Development of Therapeutic Proteins.

Journal of pharmaceutical sciences·2021
Same author

Clinical evaluation of Bladder CARE, a new epigenetic test for bladder cancer detection in urine samples.

Clinical epigenetics·2021
Same author

Phase-Appropriate Application of Analytical Methods to Monitor Subvisible Particles Across the Biotherapeutic Drug Product Life Cycle.

The AAPS journal·2019
Same author

Unique Substrate Specificity of SplE Serine Protease from Staphylococcus aureus.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Protein Engineering by Yeast Surface Display
05:49

Protein Engineering by Yeast Surface Display

Published on: November 29, 2024

Flow cytometric sorting of bacterial surface-displayed libraries.

Sophia Kenrick1, Jeffrey Rice, Patrick Daugherty

  • 1University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA.

Current Protocols in Cytometry
|September 5, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This study provides protocols for isolating binding peptides from bacterial surface-displayed libraries using flow cytometry. The methods work for a wide range of library sizes and display systems. Researchers can use these protocols to identify peptides that bind to both proteins and non-protein targets, such as whole cells or particles. Flow cytometry is used to evaluate binding properties and optimize sorting conditions for maximum affinity. The study suggests that these methods can be adapted for various binding scenarios and library formats.

Keywords:
Bacterial display librariesPeptide sortingFlow cytometry protocolsBinding affinity optimization

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry
08:30

Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry

Published on: June 6, 2018

Semi-automated Biopanning of Bacterial Display Libraries for Peptide Affinity Reagent Discovery and Analysis of Resulting Isolates
13:49

Semi-automated Biopanning of Bacterial Display Libraries for Peptide Affinity Reagent Discovery and Analysis of Resulting Isolates

Published on: December 6, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Protein Engineering by Yeast Surface Display
05:49

Protein Engineering by Yeast Surface Display

Published on: November 29, 2024

Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry
08:30

Characterization of Aquatic Biofilms with Flow Cytometry

Published on: June 6, 2018

Semi-automated Biopanning of Bacterial Display Libraries for Peptide Affinity Reagent Discovery and Analysis of Resulting Isolates
13:49

Semi-automated Biopanning of Bacterial Display Libraries for Peptide Affinity Reagent Discovery and Analysis of Resulting Isolates

Published on: December 6, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biology techniques
  • Protein engineering
  • Flow cytometry applications

Background:

Prior research has shown that combinatorial libraries displayed on bacterial surfaces can be used to identify peptides with specific binding properties. However, isolating these peptides efficiently remains a challenge. It was already known that flow cytometry can distinguish between cells based on surface features. That uncertainty drove the need for protocols that work across multiple display systems. No prior work had resolved how to optimize sorting conditions for diverse targets. This gap motivated the development of methods suitable for large libraries and various scaffolds. Researchers have proposed that flow cytometry can help assess binding affinity. But the exact parameters for maximizing binding remained unclear.

Purpose Of The Study:

This paper aims to provide detailed protocols for isolating binding peptides from bacterial surface-displayed libraries. The specific problem is the lack of standardized methods for different display systems and library sizes. The motivation comes from the need to streamline peptide discovery across multiple targets. Researchers propose that flow cytometry can be adapted for both protein and non-protein binding. The goal is to enable qualitative analysis of binding properties efficiently. The study focuses on optimizing sorting conditions for affinity maximization. It also seeks to expand the range of applicable targets, including whole cells and particles. The protocols aim to be broadly applicable across library sizes up to 5 x 10^9.

Main Methods:

The methods described use flow cytometry to isolate binding peptides from bacterial libraries. The process involves labeling target-bound cells and sorting them from unbound cells. The protocols are designed to work with various display scaffolds and large library sizes. Both protein and non-protein targets are supported in the sorting process. The approach includes tuning sorting conditions to enhance binding affinity. Qualitative analysis is performed using flow cytometry to evaluate binding properties. The methods allow for the characterization of displayed peptides' interactions with specific targets. The procedures are adaptable to a wide range of library formats and binding scenarios.

Main Results:

The strongest finding is that flow cytometry can effectively isolate binding peptides from bacterial libraries. The methods work for library sizes up to approximately 5 x 10^9 or more. The protocols are suitable for both protein and non-protein targets, including whole cells. Sorting conditions can be adjusted to maximize binding affinity. The approach enables qualitative analysis of displayed peptides' binding properties. The study found that the methods are compatible with a variety of display scaffolds. Peptides binding to inorganic particles can be efficiently isolated using these protocols. The results suggest that flow cytometry can be tuned for optimal binding outcomes.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that flow cytometry is a versatile tool for isolating binding peptides from bacterial libraries. They suggest that the methods are suitable for a wide range of display systems and library sizes. The study found that sorting conditions can be optimized to enhance binding affinity. The protocols are applicable to both protein and non-protein targets. The authors suggest that these methods can be adapted for various binding scenarios. The findings indicate that flow cytometry can be used to characterize binding properties effectively. The study concludes that these protocols are broadly applicable across multiple library formats. The authors propose that these methods can streamline peptide discovery processes.

The study uses flow cytometry to isolate binding peptides from bacterial surface-displayed libraries.

Yes, the methods are suitable for both protein and non-protein targets, including whole cells and inorganic particles.

Flow cytometry allows qualitative analysis of binding properties and can be tuned to maximize binding affinity.

Sorting conditions are adjusted to enhance binding affinity and isolate peptides with specific binding properties.

The protocols are suitable for library sizes up to approximately 5 x 10^9 or more.

The authors suggest that these protocols can streamline peptide discovery and are broadly applicable across multiple library formats.