Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Validity of a discharge diagnosis of heart failure: implications of misdiagnosing
Cândida Fonseca1, Pedro Morais Sarmento, Filipa Marques
1Department of Medicine, São Francisco Xavier Hospital and Faculty of Medical Sciences, New University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal. candiddafonseca@sapo.pt
Insights
Accurate heart failure (HF) diagnosis at discharge is crucial. This study reveals that death/discharge diagnosis of HF (DDHF) is often inaccurate, underestimating HF prevalence and costs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Healthcare Management
Background:
- Hospitalization costs for heart failure (HF) are substantial.
- The accuracy of death/discharge diagnosis of HF (DDHF) is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of DDHF.
- To assess the impact of misdiagnosing HF on patient data.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed case notes of patients admitted to a medical department (Jan-June 2001).
- Included patients with DDHF or potential precursors of HF (PPHF).
- Classified HF diagnoses using European Society of Cardiology guidelines (definite, possible, miscoded).
Main Results:
- Of 157 DDHF cases, 130 were correct, 21 possible HF, and 6 miscoded.
- 38 of 77 PPHF cases had definite HF.
- Overall DDHF accuracy was 72.2%, with 21.1% underdiagnosis and 8.3% overdiagnosis.
Conclusions:
- DDHF significantly underestimates the true prevalence, burden, and costs of heart failure.
- Improved diagnostic accuracy at discharge is needed to accurately capture HF admissions.
Abstract:
Heart failure (HF) costs are largely due to hospitalization. The validity of a death/discharge diagnosis of HF (DDHF) is largely unknown. The authors assessed the validity of DDHF and the impact of misdiagnosing. The case notes of patients consecutively admitted to a medical department between January and June 2001 were reviewed. Cases with DDHF or cardiovascular diseases, potential precursors of HF (PPHF), were included. The diagnosis of HF (European Society of Cardiology guidelines) was classified as definite, possible, or miscoded. Of the 1038 patients admitted, 234 were enrolled: 157 with DDHF and 77 with PPHF. One hundred eighty patients had a definite diagnosis of HF. Of the 157 diagnoses coded as definite HF, 130 were correct, 21 had possible HF, and 6 were miscoded. Of the 77 patients classified as having PPHF, 38 had definite HF. The accuracy of the DDHF diagnosis was 72.2%: 21.1% were underdiagnosed and 8.3% overdiagnosed. DDHF failed to capture many HF admissions and therefore alone underestimates the prevalence, burden, and costs of the syndrome.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations