Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
Published on: January 6, 2023
Predictors of complications of endovascular chronic lead extractions from pacemakers and defibrillators: a
Sunil K Agarwal1, Swapna Kamireddy, Jan Nemec
1Section of Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Insights
Chronic lead extraction complications are predicted by the number of leads removed and defibrillator device type. Removing unused leads may reduce extraction risks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
- Interventional Procedures
Background:
- Increasing rates of chronic lead extractions from cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices necessitate understanding associated risks.
- Complications following lead extraction procedures pose a significant clinical challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify predictors of complications associated with chronic lead extractions from CRM devices.
- To analyze factors contributing to both major and minor complications post-extraction.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 212 patients undergoing endovascular chronic CRM lead extraction between 2002 and 2008.
- Collection of demographic data, procedural details, and 30-day post-extraction complication data.
- Statistical analysis to determine independent predictors of complications.
Main Results:
- A total of 26 complications (11.8%) occurred in 25 patients, including 9 major (4.2%) and 17 minor (8.0%) events.
- Higher number of explanted right ventricular leads (HR=3.51, P=0.013) independently predicted complications.
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead extraction showed a trend toward significance (HR=2.57, P=0.053) compared to pacemaker leads; elevated white blood cell count predicted major complications (HR=1.52, P=0.005).
Conclusions:
- The number of extracted leads and the presence of defibrillator leads are significant predictors of complications.
- A prospective strategy involving removal of all leads not connected to a device may reduce complication risks.
- Further research is warranted to validate the potential benefits of removing unused leads.
Background:
National trends in chronic lead extractions from cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices are on the rise.
Objective:
The main objective of the study was to identify the predictors of complications of chronic lead extractions.
Methods:
All patients who underwent endovascular chronic CRM lead extraction at our institution between 2002 and 2008 were included in this analysis. Demographic data as well as details of the extraction procedure and its complications within the ensuing 30 days were collected on all patients.
Results:
Data of 212 consecutive patients (456 leads, age = 65 +/- 17 years, men 75%, left ventricular ejection fraction = 36 +/- 16%, coronary artery disease 80%, defibrillators 49%) were analyzed. There were a total of 26 (11.8%) complications in 25 patients including 9 (4.2%) major complications (death 1, hemothorax 4, pneumothorax 2, tamponade 1, stroke 1) and 17 (8.0%) minor complications. Independent predictors of any complications included a higher number of explanted right ventricular leads (HR = 3.51, P = 0.013). Explantation of ICD as opposed to a pacemaker device showed a strong trend toward significance (HR = 2.57, P = 0.053). An elevated white blood cell count also predicted major complications (HR = 1.52, P = 0.005).
Conclusion:
Predictors of complications after lead extraction procedures include a higher number of extracted leads and the presence of defibrillator as opposed to pacemaker leads. A new paradigm of the removal of all leads not connected to a device may, therefore, reduce the risk of complications from lead extraction procedures and deserves to be tested prospectively.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
06:04Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025