Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026
Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
Dosimetric verification of RapidArc treatment delivery
Stine Korreman1, Joakim Medin, Flemming Kjaer-Kristoffersen
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen O, Denmark. stine.korreman@rh.regionh.dk
Purpose:
Recently, Varian Medical Systems have announced the introduction of a new treatment technique, in which dose is delivered over a single gantry rotation with variable MLC positions, dose rate and gantry speed. In February 2008, a preclinical installation of the RapidArc beam delivery approach was carried out on a Varian Clinac at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen. The purpose of the installation was to perform measurements to verify the correctness of doses delivered with the RapidArc technique. In May 2008, the clinical release of the RapidArc application was installed at Rigshospitalet.
Methods And Materials:
Nine treatment plans were generated in the Eclipse version 8.5 including the RapidArc optimizer for H&N and prostate cases. The plans were delivered to the Scandidos Delta4 cylindrical diode array phantom. First, the measured dose distributions were compared with the calculated doses. All plans were then delivered several times to verify consistency of the delivery. Gamma analysis was used to verify the correspondence between dose distributions. The temporal resolution of the delivery was analysed by investigating the arc segments between control points separately.
Results:
Overall, good agreement was observed between measured and calculated doses in most cases with gamma values above 1 in >95% of measured points. The reproducibility of delivery was also very high. Gamma analysis between two consecutive runs of the same delivery plan generally showed gamma values above 1 in none of the measured points, and dose deviation less than 1%. Temporal analysis showed small discrepancies between doses delivered between control points (approximately 2 degrees of the rotation) in consecutive runs of a plan, however these were cancelled out in the accumulated dose.
Conclusion:
The delivery of RapidArc beam delivery has been verified to correspond well with calculated dose distributions for a number of different cases. The delivery was very reproducible, and was carried out with high stability of the accelerator performance.
