Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026
05:26
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Challenging convention: symbolic interactionism and grounded theory
1Sydney Adventist Hospital, 185 Fox Valley Road, Wahroonga, 2076 NSW, Australia. barbaran@sah.org.au
Collegian (Royal College of Nursing, Australia)
|September 11, 2008
Summary
Researchers should critically evaluate theoretical perspectives, like symbolic interactionism, when using Glaserian grounded theory (GT) for clinical problems. The choice of a suitable theoretical lens is crucial for robust qualitative research findings.
Area of Science:
- Qualitative Research Methodology
- Sociology
- Health Sciences
Background:
- Limited literature exists on researcher decisions regarding theoretical perspectives in clinical problem-driven research, especially for Glaserian grounded theory (GT).
- Symbolic interactionism (SI) is often conventionally applied to GT, but its appropriateness is questioned.
- The author's study on end-stage renal disease patients necessitated a critical examination of theoretical underpinnings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze key issues in selecting appropriate theoretical perspectives for Glaserian GT.
- To challenge the conventional use of symbolic interactionism (SI) in Glaserian GT.
- To advocate for a theoretically congruent approach tailored to the clinical research problem.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of theoretical congruence in qualitative research.
- Application of Glaserian grounded theory (GT) methodology.
- Exploration of psychosocial processes in patients with end-stage renal disease on home hemodialysis.
Main Results:
- The study highlights that symbolic interactionism (SI) may not always be the most appropriate theoretical perspective for Glaserian grounded theory (GT).
- The research emphasizes the importance of aligning theoretical frameworks with the specific clinical problem and research context.
- Perception emerged as a central element in understanding patient experiences.
Conclusions:
- Researchers must thoughtfully select theoretical perspectives to align with Glaserian GT and the research problem.
- Moving beyond conventional theoretical choices, such as symbolic interactionism (SI), can enhance the rigor of grounded theory studies.
- An appropriate theoretical perspective is vital for capturing the reality of participants' perceptions in health research.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Structuralism
Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
01:20Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group effort.
01:21Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
02:30Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
00:57Deindividuation
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
01:29Social Psychology and Individual Behavior
Social psychology examines how group dynamics, emotions, and cultural influences shape individual actions and decision-making. These elements interact to form behavioral patterns that affect personal choices and social interactions.The Role of Group DynamicsGroups play a crucial role in shaping behavior by reinforcing norms and expectations. Individuals derive a sense of self from group membership, often aligning their behaviors with group norms to maintain social cohesion. For example, an...