Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Blind Procedures
Blinding
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Patient-Centric Drug Product Quality Specifications: a Convergence of Clinical and Nonclinical Considerations.
Dissolution of Oral Solid Dosage Formulations: Surrogate Models and Real-time Release.
Quasi-Empirical Bayes methods for parameter estimation involving many small samples.
Block designs in method transfer experiments.
1Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical R&D, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey 08869, USA.
This study explores block designs for pharmaceutical method transfer, ensuring recipient labs can accurately perform analytical procedures. It validates lab performance beyond just the lab effect, confirming method reliability.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical development
- Analytical chemistry
- Statistical methodology
Background:
- Method transfer is crucial for adopting analytical procedures from research to production labs.
- Ensuring recipient laboratory capability is key for successful method adoption.
- Factors like analyst, apparatus, and reagent batches can influence transfer outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To apply block designs for a comprehensive study of method transfer.
- To evaluate laboratory performance beyond the simple laboratory effect.
- To provide an equivalence approach for comparing laboratories and justifying method transfer.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing various block designs to study method transfer comprehensively.
- Applying an equivalence approach for laboratory comparison.
- Analyzing least squares means and subject-specific means for justification.
Main Results:
- Block designs offer a robust framework for method transfer studies.
- The equivalence approach effectively compares laboratory performance.
- Justification for method transfer can be statistically supported.
Conclusions:
- Block designs enhance the understanding and execution of pharmaceutical method transfer.
- Statistical equivalence testing is vital for validating recipient laboratory performance.
- This approach ensures reliable analytical procedure adoption in commercial settings.


