Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

[Film-screen combinations for mammography].

M Säbel¹, H Aichinger

¹Frauenklinik der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.

Aktuelle Radiologie

|May 1, 1991

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Patterns, predictors and prognostic relevance of high-grade hematotoxicity after temozolomide or temozolomide-lomustine in the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial.

Journal of neuro-oncology·2023

Same author

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of dura sealant patch in reducing cerebrospinal fluid leakage following elective cranial surgery (ENCASE II): study protocol for a randomized, two-arm, multicenter trial.

Trials·2022

Same author

First-line high-dose therapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation in patients with primary central nervous system non-Hodgkin lymphomas-a single-centre experience in 61 patients.

Annals of hematology·2022

Same author

An integrative radiological, histopathological and molecular analysis of pediatric pontine histone-wildtype glioma with MYCN amplification (HGG-MYCN).

Acta neuropathologica communications·2019

Same author

Elevated S100A8 protein expression in breast cancer cells and breast tumor stroma is prognostic of poor disease outcome.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2017

Same author

The impact of improved treatment strategies on overall survival in glioblastoma patients.

Acta neurochirurgica·2013

Optimizing mammography quality assurance is crucial for breast cancer screening. Current German and European standards lack consistency in physical imaging parameters, impacting diagnostic accuracy.

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging Physics
Radiology
Quality Assurance in Healthcare

Context:

Increasing importance of mammography for early breast cancer detection through screening programs.
Existing German guidelines (Bundesärztekammer, Röntgenverordnung, DIN 6868) and European quality criteria show inconsistencies.
Mammography demands high image quality, necessitating precise standardization.

Purpose:

To critically evaluate the consistency of physical imaging system parameters in current mammography quality assurance standards.
To identify discrepancies between German and European guidelines regarding dose switch-off values, image receptor unsharpness, and noise.
To highlight the inadequate harmonization of medical quality requirements and radiographic guidelines concerning visual resolution capacity and contrast.

Summary:

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis reveals significant inconsistencies in tolerances and guide values for physical variables across mammography standards.
Specific issues include varying dose switch-off values and insufficient guidance on the impact of image receptor unsharpness and noise.
Contrast, a critical parameter, is largely unaddressed in existing quality assurance documents.

Impact:

Proposes detailed discussion of identified criticisms to improve mammography image quality.
Aims to provide recommendations for more precise specifications and better delineation of physical image quality parameters.
Contributes to enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of breast cancer screening programs through standardized, high-quality mammography.