Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward a Mobile Platform for Real-world Digital Measurement of Depression: User-Centered Design, Data Quality, and Behavioral and Clinical Modeling.

JMIR mental health·2021
Same author

50+ years of P300: Where are we now?

Psychophysiology·2020
Same author

Heart rate and P300: Integrating peripheral and central indices of cognitive processing.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2016
Same author

Carboxyfullerene neuroprotection postinjury in Parkinsonian nonhuman primates.

Annals of neurology·2014
Same author

Event-related delta, theta, alpha and gamma correlates to auditory oddball processing during Vipassana meditation.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2012
Same author

P3a from white noise.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.8K

Affective ERP processing in a visual oddball task: arousal, valence, and gender.

Bella Rozenkrants1, John Polich

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Clinical Neurophysiology : Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
|September 12, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Emotional stimuli processing is mainly driven by arousal levels, not valence. This study used visual pictures and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to show arousal influences brain responses more than emotional content.

More Related Videos

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

14.3K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

7.8K
Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

14.3K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Affective Science
  • Psychophysiology

Background:

  • Emotional stimuli significantly impact cognitive processing.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer a temporal measure of neural activity during emotional perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how arousal and valence of visual stimuli affect event-related brain potentials (ERPs).
  • To determine the primary determinant of affective processing in the brain.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the International Affective Pictures System (IAPS) with distinct arousal and valence levels.
  • Employed an oddball paradigm with visual patterns as standards and IAPS images as targets.
  • Measured participant responses and reaction times across different affective conditions.

Main Results:

  • Higher arousal stimuli elicited larger N2, P3, early slow wave, and late slow wave ERP amplitudes.
  • Valence effects on ERP amplitudes were minimal, mainly appearing in later components and specific electrode positions.
  • No significant gender differences were observed in the ERP responses.

Conclusions:

  • Arousal level is the dominant factor in affective oddball processing, influencing ERP amplitudes.
  • Valence plays a minor role in modulating ERPs during this task.
  • Affective processing involves attentional mechanisms sensitive to stimulus arousal.