Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes

VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes

Overview of VSEPR Theory

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Seizure forecasting using machine learning models trained by seizure diaries.

Physiological measurement·2022

Same author

Artificial intelligence for classification of temporal lobe epilepsy with ROI-level MRI data: A worldwide ENIGMA-Epilepsy study.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2021

Same author

Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgical Outcomes Can Be Inferred Based on Structural Connectome Hubs: A Machine Learning Study.

Annals of neurology·2020

Same author

The ENIGMA-Epilepsy working group: Mapping disease from large data sets.

Human brain mapping·2020

Same author

White matter connectomes at birth accurately predict cognitive abilities at age 2.

NeuroImage·2019

Same author

RNAa and Vector-Mediated Overexpression of DIRAS1 Suppresses Tumor Growth and Migration in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids·2018

Same journal

Relation DETR+: Exploring Explicit Position Relation Prior for Dense Prediction.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026

Same journal

RBF++: Quantifying and Optimizing Reasoning Boundaries across Measurable and Unmeasurable Capabilities for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026

Same journal

CAFE: Cross-View Adaptive Fusion and Cluster Center Enhancement for Robust Multi-View Clustering.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026

Same journal

DIVER: Reinforced Diffusion Breaks Imitation Bottlenecks in End-to-End Autonomous Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026

Same journal

Ethics-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Rare-Event Risk Control in Interactive Urban Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026

Same journal

Learning Shape Anchors for Holistic Indoor Scene Understanding.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

Evaluating shape correspondence for statistical shape analysis: a benchmark study.

Brent C Munsell¹, Pahal Dalal, Song Wang

¹Department of Computer Science andEngineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. munsell@engr.sc.edu

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

|September 13, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new benchmark for evaluating landmark-based shape correspondence in statistical shape analysis. It uses synthetic data and landmark-independent measures for more objective performance assessment.

More Related Videos

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Published on: February 27, 2026

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Published on: February 27, 2026

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

Area of Science:

Computer Vision
Medical Imaging
Computational Geometry

Background:

Landmark-based shape correspondence is crucial for statistical shape analysis.
Existing evaluation methods for shape correspondence lack objectivity.
Objective evaluation is needed to assess the performance of shape correspondence algorithms.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce a novel benchmark for evaluating landmark-based shape correspondence.
To enable more objective assessment of shape correspondence algorithms.
To propose new, landmark-independent performance measures.

Main Methods:

Generating synthetic shape instances from a statistical shape model to define a ground-truth shape space.
Applying a test shape correspondence algorithm to identify landmarks on synthetic shapes.
Constructing a new statistical shape model and shape space from identified landmarks.
Comparing the derived shape space against the ground-truth shape space using new performance measures.

Main Results:

The proposed benchmark provides a more objective evaluation of shape correspondence.
Three new landmark-independent performance measures were introduced.
The benchmark is initially developed for 2D shapes but is extensible to 3D.

Conclusions:

The new benchmark offers a more rigorous and objective approach to evaluating shape correspondence algorithms.
The landmark-independent performance measures enhance the reliability of the evaluation.
This methodology advances statistical shape analysis by improving correspondence evaluation.