Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The acceptability and feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion versus usual care in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a qualitative study.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2026
Same author

Barriers & Facilitators to Help-Seeking Behaviour for Abnormal Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men: Systematic Review.

Cancer medicine·2025
Same author

Strategies for maintaining a positive body image in the face of stigma.

Journal of health psychology·2025
Same author

Knowledge and comfort predict teaching about sexism in school teachers.

Social psychology of education : an international journal·2025
Same author

Corrigendum: A longitudinal investigation of quality of life and negative emotions in misophonia.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2023
Same author

"I'm Not the Same Person Anymore": Thematic Analysis Exploring Experiences of Dependence to Prescribed Analgesics in Patients with Chronic Pain in the UK.

Pain and therapy·2023

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding homeopathic decision-making: a qualitative study.

Alexandra L Burch1, Bridget Dibb, Sarah B Brien

  • 1Primary Medical Care, University of Southampton, UK.

Forschende Komplementarmedizin (2006)
|September 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Homeopaths utilize pattern recognition, hypothetico-deductive reasoning, and intuition in their prescribing decisions. This qualitative study developed the P.H.I.RM model, highlighting evidence-based processes and the role of the patient-practitioner relationship in homeopathic care.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Homeopathic medicine
  • Clinical decision-making
  • Qualitative research

Background:

  • Limited understanding of homeopathic clinical decision-making processes.
  • Existing research primarily focuses on conventional medicine.
  • Need for qualitative exploration of how homeopaths prescribe.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how homeopaths make prescribing decisions.
  • Focus on the initial patient consultation.
  • Investigate the cognitive processes involved.

Main Methods:

  • In-depth, semistructured interviews with 14 private homeopaths.
  • Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) conducted by three researchers.
  • Qualitative approach to understand the decision-making process.

Main Results:

  • Identification of pattern recognition (P), hypothetico-deductive reasoning (H), and intuition (I) as key cognitive processes.
  • Development of the P.H.I.RM decision-making model (Precise Remedy Match).
  • Themes emerged regarding decision-making processes, influencing factors, bias avoidance, and the patient-practitioner relationship.

Conclusions:

  • The P.H.I.R-M model illustrates an evidence-based decision-making process for homeopaths.
  • Reinforces the significant role of intuition in homeopathic practice.
  • Highlights the importance of practitioner awareness and patient relationship in clinical decisions.