Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity01:24

Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity

A stroke engine has a slider-crank mechanism that converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider.
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it instrumental in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficient screening for enhanced Xe/Kr separation <i>via</i> fixed-ligand, variable-metal strategy in metal-organic frameworks.

RSC advances·2026
Same author

Time is of the Essence! Long-Term Functional, Motor and Sensory Outcomes After Surgical Fixation of Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of pediatric orthopedics·2026
Same author

Application Advances of Gold Nanoparticles in Cancer Theranostics: From Physicochemical Mechanisms to Multifunctional Nanoplatforms.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Modification of Activated Carbon by a Mixed Molten Salt Template Method for Enhanced Kr/Ar Separation.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

The evaluation of sexual dysfunction in patients with spinopelvic dissociation underwent triangular osteosynthesis: A single-center retrospective study.

Injury·2026
Same author

Bifunctional Memristor with Neuronal-Synaptic Coupling for Passively Self-Adaptive Reservoir Computing.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

A method to calculate relative spinal motion without digitization.

Chunhui Wu1, Amir A Mehbod, Serkan Erkan

  • 1Foundation for the Advancement of Spinal Knowledge, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA. cwu@spineknowledge.org

The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society
|September 16, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new data reduction method simplifies calculating spine motion (range of motion) from raw marker data. This approach enhances consistency and reduces experimental complexity in biomechanical studies.

More Related Videos

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Spinal motion analysis
  • Kinematics

Background:

  • Existing methods for spinal motion analysis, such as Eulerian and projection methods, have limitations.
  • Eulerian methods using Euler angles provide approximations, while projection methods can be affected by local coordinate system accuracy.
  • A need exists for a more consistent data reduction method for calculating relative spinal motion from raw marker data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel data reduction technique for calculating relative spinal motion.
  • To enable calculations based on arbitrarily oriented local coordinate systems of individual vertebrae.
  • To simplify experimental procedures for multidirectional spine testing.

Main Methods:

  • Relative spinal motion was determined using transformation matrices applied to raw marker data.
  • The Eulerian formulation utilized transformation matrices instead of vector operations on Euler angles.
  • Projection axes were determined by transforming local coordinate systems.

Main Results:

  • The new data reduction method was successfully applied to analyze data from an L1-L2 motion segment.
  • Minimal differences were observed between the new Euler and projection method implementations.
  • The method was validated on a human cadaveric lumbar motion segment across various loading conditions.

Conclusions:

  • An alternative data reduction method for Euler and projection angles was developed for in vitro spine biomechanical studies.
  • This method eliminates the need for digitization in many multidirectional flexibility tests, as relative spinal motion is independent of local coordinate system orientation.
  • The new method offers more consistent kinematical results and significantly simplifies experimental procedures compared to previous techniques.