Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

Non-users and limited users of cochlear implants.

J Ray1, T Wright, C Fielden

  • 1Midlands Cochlear Implant Programme, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. jaydip@bigfoot.com

Cochlear Implants International
|September 16, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Added value of Joint ENT-Rheumatology clinic in the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis: One year's experience.

American journal of otolaryngology·2022
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum 2018: St. John's, NL Sept. 13-15, 2018.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

Age-related hearing loss and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis and systematic review of population-based studies.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
Same author

Customised vestibular rehabilitation with the addition of virtual reality based therapy in the management of persistent postural-perceptual dizziness.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
Same author

Surgical and functional outcomes of two types of transcutaneous bone conduction implants.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2020
Same author

Exploring a route to a selective and sensitive portable system for explosive detection- swab spray ionisation coupled to of high-field assisted waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS).

Forensic science international. Synergy·2020
Same journal

Like choosing between guitars: acoustic, electroacoustic, and electric stimulation in paediatric cochlear implant candidates with residual hearing.

Cochlear implants international·2026
Same journal

Use of trans-tympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (TT-EABR) in decision making of cochlear implants in hypoplastic auditory nerve cases.

Cochlear implants international·2026
Same journal

Task-dependent auditory memory performance in children using cochlear implant.

Cochlear implants international·2026
Same journal

'Meeting' the patient where they are: reflections on the changing patient-clinician dynamic in remote cochlear implant care.

Cochlear implants international·2026
Same journal

What stops audiologists using remote care tools to care for adults with cochlear implants?

Cochlear implants international·2026
Same journal

The effects of frequency overlap on functional listening outcomes in postlingually deafened bimodal cochlear implant users with aidable residual low-to-mid frequency hearing.

Cochlear implants international·2026
See all related articles

Few cochlear implant recipients become non-users or limited users, with peer pressure a key factor in children and depression/tinnitus in adults. Understanding these predictors can improve cochlear implant outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Otolaryngology
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Cochlear implantation is a common treatment for severe to profound hearing loss.
  • Assessing the long-term outcomes and adherence to cochlear implant use is crucial for patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the incidence of non-use and limited use of cochlear implants.
  • To identify predictors associated with non-use and limited use in both pediatric and adult recipients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 423 cochlear implant recipients' data (1990-2000).
  • Inclusion of questionnaires, clinical, and audiological data from adult and pediatric programs.
  • Calculation of non-use and limited use rates.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

Main Results:

  • Overall incidence of non-use or limited use was 2.82% (12/423 recipients).
  • Pediatric non/limited users (2.9%) and adult non/limited users (2.78%) showed similar rates.
  • Key predictors identified: peer pressure (pediatric), depression, tinnitus, neurological issues, and non-auditory stimulation (adults).

Conclusions:

  • The incidence of cochlear implant non-use and limited use is low.
  • Predictors vary by age group, highlighting the need for tailored interventions.
  • Addressing psychosocial and medical factors is essential for optimizing cochlear implant benefits.