Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

First Impression01:09

First Impression

First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The vigilance decrement: its first 75 years.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Does the output form of inhibition of return operate at or after the bottleneck?

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

Role of social competence in emotion processing among emerging adults with anxiety.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Attention to Instagram features in female youth with anxiety symptoms.

Comprehensive psychiatry·2025
Same author

Posner's Endogenous Beam Is (Still) Not Treisman's Glue.

Experimental psychology·2025
Same author

Attentional biases for dynamic stimuli in emerging adults with anxiety: A preliminary eye-tracking study.

Journal of psychiatric research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

On finding negative priming from distractors.

John J Christie1, Raymond M Klein

  • 1Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. jc@or.psychology.dal.ca

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|September 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Negative priming, a key aspect of selective attention, is clarified by examining distractor effects across multiple conditions. This research distinguishes theories based on ignoring distractors from those like inhibition of return.

More Related Videos

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Negative priming from distractors is a significant area of study in selective attention.
  • The phenomenon is currently ambiguous due to multiple potential explanations.
  • Existing empirical research often relies on limited experimental designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the mechanisms underlying negative priming.
  • To differentiate between theories of negative priming by proposing a more comprehensive experimental approach.
  • To test whether theories attributing negative priming to distractor ignoring predict a distinct pattern of results.

Main Methods:

  • Proposing a data collection strategy involving a fuller set of experimental conditions than typically employed.
  • Analyzing patterns of results across these conditions to differentiate between theoretical explanations.
  • Comparing predictions from distractor-ignoring theories with those from alternative theories like inhibition of return.

Main Results:

  • Theories that attribute negative priming to ignoring distractors predict a consistent pattern of results across a comprehensive set of conditions.
  • Alternative theories, such as inhibition of return, do not predict this specific pattern.
  • This suggests a method to empirically distinguish between competing explanations for negative priming.

Conclusions:

  • A comprehensive approach to data collection is crucial for resolving ambiguity in negative priming research.
  • The proposed method can empirically validate theories of negative priming based on distractor ignoring.
  • This work provides a clearer understanding of selective attention mechanisms.