Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model01:09

Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model

Drug response models describe how pharmacological agents interact with biological systems to produce measurable effects. Baseline responses are inherent physiological activities without a drug significantly influencing the observed pharmacological outcomes. Depending on the drug response model employed, these baseline responses may combine with the drug's effect in either an additive or proportional manner.Additive Drug Response ModelIn the additive model, the drug effect is independent of the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changes in numbers needed to treat and hospital care expenditures of optimized indications for primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a scenario analysis.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2025
Same author

Regularized parametric survival modeling to improve risk prediction models.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2023
Same author

A European-Japanese study on peach allergy: IgE to Pru p 7 associates with severity.

Allergy·2023
Same author

Hospital utilisation and the costs associated with complications of ICD implantation in a contemporary primary prevention cohort.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2022
Same author

Electrocardiogram-based mortality prediction in patients with COVID-19 using machine learning.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2022
Same author

Enhanced PeriOperative Care and Health protection programme for the prevention of surgical site infections after elective abdominal surgery (EPO<sub>2</sub>CH): statistical analysis plan of a randomised controlled multicentre superiority trial.

Trials·2021
Same journal

Methotrexate and folic acid supplementation in rheumatoid arthritis: A Japanese claims database and 538,985 patients from April 2015 to November 2020.

International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026
Same journal

Cardiac arrest in an adolescent following an overdose of antidepressants comprising sertraline, quetiapine fumarate, and lamotrigine: Case report.

International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026
Same journal

Recombinant human growth hormone in pediatric patients using the FAERS database: Safety profile and update for the period 2004 - 2024.

International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026
Same journal

The triple neuromodulatory-immunomodulatory axis.

International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026
Same journal

Novel intravenous human IVIG in patients with secondary immunodeficiency: Interim analysis of a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study.

International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026
Same journal

Network meta-analysis of bisphosphonates in the treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer.

International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Random effects models in clinical research.

T J Cleophas1, A H Zwinderman

  • 1Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. a.j.m.cleophas@asz.nl

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
|September 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Random effects models in clinical trials account for patient variability, unlike fixed effects models. Understanding these models is crucial for accurate interpretation of treatment efficacy and subgroup differences.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Statistical modeling in clinical research
  • Analysis of variance (ANOVA) applications

Background:

  • Fixed effects models assume uniform patient response to treatments.
  • Random effects models are necessary when patient responses are heterogeneous.
  • Differences in observed data can stem from residual error and between-patient variations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the principles of random effects models in ANOVA.
  • To provide illustrative examples of study designs suitable for random effects models.

Main Methods:

  • Comparing between-doctor variability to within-doctor variability for random effects model appropriateness.
  • Analyzing data from multiple studies simultaneously, considering interaction effects between study and treatment.
  • Utilizing random effects models to assess treatment efficacy against interaction effects in multicenter or crossover studies.

Main Results:

  • Random effects models are suitable when heterogeneity is expected across doctors, studies, or health centers.
  • Significant interactions between study/center and treatment efficacy necessitate random effects models.
  • In crossover studies, random effects models can identify subgroup effects impacting treatment differences.

Conclusions:

  • Random effects models allow for subgroup analysis without data partitioning.
  • Clinical investigators often misapply fixed effects models, leading to biased results.
  • Awareness and correct application of random effects models are vital for accurate clinical data interpretation.