Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel 3D-Printed Titanium Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Hip Dysplasia in Young Dogs
Published on: April 19, 2024
Poor survival of ABG I hip prosthesis in younger patients
Jiri Gallo1, Katerina Langova, Vitezslav Havranek
1Department of Orthopedics, Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. jiri.gallo@volny.cz
Insights
Hydroxyapatite coated hip implants showed poor 12-year survival in younger patients, with osteolysis and aseptic loosening being primary failure causes. Smaller cup sizes increased revision risk due to wear complications.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Device Engineering
Background:
- Hydroxyapatite coated (HAC) hip implants have a long clinical history.
- Existing studies often lack long-term outcome data, limiting predictions of implant longevity.
- This study focuses on the long-term performance of HAC total hip arthroplasty in a younger patient demographic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the 10-year performance and survival rate of hydroxyapatite coated (HAC) total hip arthroplasty in younger patients.
- To identify the primary reasons for implant failure and revision in this cohort.
- To assess the impact of specific factors, such as cup size, on implant survival.
Main Methods:
- An observational retrospective study design was employed.
- 137 consecutive cases using the ABG I prosthesis were analyzed, with 128 hips available for final assessment.
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate implant survival probability over 12 years.
Main Results:
- The overall 12-year cumulative survival rate for the implants was 0.55.
- Periprosthetic osteolysis (57%) and aseptic loosening (28%) were the most common reasons for failure.
- Smaller acetabular component size was identified as a significant risk factor for revision due to wear-related complications (OR=4.3).
Conclusions:
- The study indicates suboptimal 12-year survivorship for cementless acetabular components, particularly in younger patients.
- High rates of osteolysis, linked to polyethylene wear, were the primary drivers of premature implant failure.
- These findings highlight potential concerns regarding the long-term durability of certain HAC hip implant designs.
Background:
Hydroxyapatite coated (HAC) hip implants have been used in clinical practice for more than two decades. However, the majority of studies have reported only intermediate term outcomes that are not reliable for predicting long-term behavior in all implants. The aim of this study was to determine the performance of HAC total hip arthroplasty in younger patients over a 10-year follow-up period.
Methods And Results:
This was an observational retrospective study of a 137 consecutive hips with the ABG I prosthesis. Of these, 128 were available for the last investigation. Median duration of follow-up was 10.9 years. The mean age at time of index surgery was 46+/-6.7 years. Probability of implant survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The overall 12-year cumulative survival was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.443-0.659). Periprosthetic osteolysis (57 %) was the most frequent reason for failure followed by aseptic loosening (28 %). When only aseptic loosening was included in the analysis, the same figures for cup and stem were 0.873 (95% CI, 0.808-0.938) and 0.992 (95% CI, 0.976- 1.0), respectively. Patients with a smaller cup size were those at high risk for revision due to wear-related complications (odds ratio, OR=4.3; 95% CI, 1.734-10.555).
Conclusion:
This study reports one of the poorest 12-year survivorship data for cementless acetabular component in the literature. The main reason for premature failure was osteolysis, strongly related to high wear rate of polyethylene.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
07:45The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022