Related Experiment Videos
A bone structural basis for fracture risk in diabetes
L Joseph Melton1, B Lawrence Riggs, Cynthia L Leibson
1Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. melton.j@mayo.edu
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
|September 18, 2008
Summary
Type 2 diabetes patients have higher bone density but similar bone strength compared to controls. This suggests elevated bone mineral density offers little fracture protection in diabetes.
Area of Science:
- Bone Metabolism and Endocrinology
- Diabetic Complications
- Skeletal Biology
Background:
- Elevated areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is paradoxically linked to increased fracture risk.
- aBMD may not accurately reflect bone strength, necessitating direct assessment of bone structure and integrity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To directly assess bone structure and strength in individuals with T2DM using quantitative computed tomography (QCT).
- To compare bone geometry, volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and estimated bone load to strength ratios between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study comparing 49 individuals with T2DM to age- and sex-matched controls from a random population sample.
- Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) was used to measure bone geometry, vBMD, and strength at the hip, spine, and wrist.
- Hip aBMD and estimated bone load to bone strength ratios were also assessed.
Main Results:
- Diabetic subjects exhibited greater hip aBMD, primarily due to higher trabecular vBMD; cortical vBMD, bone size, and thickness were similar between groups.
- While bone strength measures were generally superior in diabetic individuals, higher body weight led to increased bone loads.
- Consequently, the ratios of bone load to bone strength, indicative of fracture risk, were comparable between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects.
Conclusions:
- Elevated aBMD in T2DM does not translate to improved bone load to strength ratios, offering limited fracture protection.
- The rationale for antiresorptive therapies in T2DM patients with normal bone density is uncertain.
- Further research is required to understand potential diabetes-induced deficits in bone quality.