Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Imaging CD19+ B Cells in an Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Mouse Model using Positron Emission Tomography
Published on: January 20, 2023
Positron emission tomography in mantle cell lymphoma
Lieselot Brepoels1, Sigrid Stroobants, Walter De Wever
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg and Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. lieselot.brepoels@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans show high sensitivity for detecting Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) and its aggressive variants. However, PET and CT scans have similar prognostic value for treatment response in MCL.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma with a high relapse rate.
- Traditional response assessment relies on Computed Tomography (CT), but [(18)F]Fluorine-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has transformed response evaluation in other aggressive lymphomas.
- The utility of PET in MCL response assessment remained uninvestigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the value of PET and CT findings in evaluating treatment response in Mantle Cell Lymphoma.
- To compare the prognostic value of CT-based, PET-based, and combined PET/CT-based response criteria in MCL.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of PET and CT scans from 37 MCL patients (239 scans).
- Categorization of findings using standardized criteria: International Workshop Criteria (IWC) for CT, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for PET, and combined IWC + PET.
- Correlation of imaging findings with patient prognosis.
Main Results:
- FDG-PET demonstrated high sensitivity for MCL detection and higher uptake in the blastoid variant compared to common MCL.
- CT- and PET-based response assessments showed equivalent prognostic value.
- PET/CT provided additional prognostic information only in a subset of highly FDG-avid MCL cases.
- PET enabled early detection of preclinical relapse during surveillance, though therapeutic implications are unclear.
Conclusions:
- Routine end-of-treatment response assessment using PET in MCL is not recommended due to equivalent prognostic value compared to CT.
- PET may offer additional insights in specific highly FDG-avid MCL subpopulations.
- PET's role in early relapse detection warrants further investigation regarding therapeutic consequences.
More Related Videos
05:32Multimodal Bioluminescent and Positronic-emission Tomography/Computational Tomography Imaging of Multiple Myeloma Bone Marrow Xenografts in NOG Mice
Published on: January 7, 2019
09:34Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Published on: February 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET