Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
Published on: January 31, 2014
Approaches to handling data when a phase II trial deviates from the pre-specified Simon's two-stage design
1Department of Biostatistics and Programming, Sanofi-Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
This study addresses rigid two-stage cancer trial designs by proposing methods for handling deviations from planned patient numbers and sample sizes. It offers solutions for slower-than-expected patient recruitment in clinical research.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
- Oncology Drug Development
Background:
- Simon's two-stage designs are standard for early-phase cancer therapy trials.
- These designs have fixed rules and sample sizes, limiting flexibility.
- Real-world studies often face challenges with patient recruitment rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop flexible approaches for phase IIA cancer trials when patient accrual deviates from Simon's designs.
- To provide statistical methods for addressing deviations in sample size and event numbers.
- To guide reporting of p-values in modified trial designs.
Main Methods:
- Examining four specific scenarios of deviation from Simon's two-stage design.
- Utilizing conditional probabilities to analyze the impact of recruitment delays.
- Developing strategies for adapting trial parameters mid-study.
Main Results:
- Conditional probabilities offer a framework to manage deviations from fixed two-stage designs.
- The proposed methods allow for adjustments to sample size and event thresholds.
- Guidance is provided on maintaining statistical integrity despite design modifications.
Conclusions:
- Flexible adaptation of Simon's two-stage designs is feasible and necessary for realistic cancer trials.
- Conditional probability methods enable robust decision-making under recruitment uncertainty.
- Clear reporting of p-values is crucial when modifying trial designs due to recruitment issues.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
