Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
The value of choice: development of a new measurement tool
Jane Ogden1, Emma Daniells, Julie Barnett
1Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. J.Ogden@surrey.ac.uk
Background:
Current policy advocates individual choice across a number of domains, including healthcare provision.
Aim:
To develop a new tool for measuring people's beliefs about the value of choice in the context of healthcare provision.
Design Of Study:
Cross-sectional survey.
Setting:
Four general practices in South East England.
Method:
Nine items relating to health and general domains, derived from in-depth interviews with 22 participants, were collated into a questionnaire. This formed the measurement tool called the Choice Questionnaire (ChQ), which was completed by 823 consecutive patients (response rate = 81.2%).
Results:
Principal components analysis resulted in two factors: having choices (for example, 'I like to know all the possible ways in which I could be treated') and making choices (for example, 'I am happy for the doctor to make decisions for me'). These two constructs showed good internal consistency. One item was deleted, resulting in the 8-item ChQ. Beliefs about choice in health and general domains were not discrete. The vast majority of participants endorsed having choices as positive. In contrast, beliefs about the value of making choice were more mixed. A greater endorsement of both these aspects of choice was related to higher educational status.
Conclusion:
Results from this study indicate that choice can be usefully conceptualised as consisting of two separate constructs: having choices and making choices. The 8-item ChQ has an interpretable factor structure and has been shown to be reliable. It could be used in research to assess beliefs about the value of choice or in the clinical setting to establish whether a patient would prefer to be provided with options or to be managed in a more paternalistic way.
Related Concept Videos
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
01:09Odds Ratio
01:22Self-Report Tests of Personality
03:02Measurement: Derived Units
01:29Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
00:55Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks in the...