Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

06:45
Modified Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Patients with Thoracolumbar Kyphotic Deformity
Published on: September 16, 2022
Anterior cervical stabilization using a semi-constrained cervical plate and titanium mesh cage for single level
1Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-710, Korea.
Summary
This study on anterior cervical corpectomy found that while titanium cages and plating offer good fusion rates, larger 13-mm cages had higher failure rates than 10-mm cages.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Orthopedic implants
- Cervical spine reconstruction
Background:
- Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion is a common procedure for cervical spine instability.
- Titanium mesh cages and semi-constrained plating are used for reconstruction.
- Optimal cage size for anterior cervical stabilization remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate treatment outcomes of anterior 1-level cervical corpectomy using titanium mesh cages and semi-constrained plating.
- To compare outcomes between 10-mm and 13-mm diameter cages.
- To assess bony fusion and radiological outcomes in cervical spine reconstruction.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients undergoing anterior cervical corpectomy.
- Patients were divided into two groups: 10-mm cage (n=10) and 13-mm cage (n=10).
- Radiographic and CT scan evaluations assessed bony fusion and construct integrity.
Main Results:
- 95% of patients achieved bony consolidation at an average follow-up of 14.8 months.
- Overall construct failure rate was 25% (5/20 patients).
- The 13-mm cage group showed a significantly higher failure rate (40%) compared to the 10-mm cage group (10%) (P=0.085), primarily due to cage settling and screw-plate failure.
Conclusions:
- Anterior cervical stabilization with titanium cages and semi-constrained plating demonstrates favorable fusion rates.
- Larger cage diameter (13-mm) may be associated with increased implant failure.
- Further biomechanical and prospective studies are needed to confirm the impact of cage size on implant failure in cervical spine surgery.
