Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

07:30
Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
Angular Specificity and Test Mode Specificity of Isometric and lsokinetic Strength Training *
The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
|January 1, 1983
Summary
Strength training showed no specific angle improvements within 20 degrees. Isometric training transferred less to isokinetic testing compared to isokinetic training.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Exercise Physiology
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Understanding the specificity of strength training is crucial for optimizing exercise prescription.
- Previous research has explored how training at specific joint angles or movement speeds influences strength gains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the angular specificity and test mode specificity of strength training for elbow extensors.
- To compare the effects of isometric versus isokinetic training on strength development and transferability.
Main Methods:
- Six males and six females trained elbow extensors isometrically or isokinetically for 10 weeks.
- Training involved 80% maximal voluntary contraction, 3 sessions/week, 50 contractions/session.
- Pre- and post-training assessments included isometric (70, 90, 110 degrees) and isokinetic (30 degrees/second) testing.
Main Results:
- Both training groups showed equal isometric strength improvements across all tested angles.
- Both groups improved isokinetic strength, with the isokinetic group showing greater gains.
- Isometric training demonstrated less strength transfer to isokinetic testing compared to isokinetic training.
Conclusions:
- Strength training specificity was not observed within 20 degrees of the training angle.
- No test mode specificity was evident for isometric testing.
- Isometric training is less effective in transferring strength gains to dynamic (isokinetic) movements.

