Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

07:42
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Strain development in 3-unit implant-supported CAD/CAM restorations
Matthias Karl1, Manfred G Wichmann, Siegfried M Heckmann
1Department of Prosthodontics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. karl_matthias@web.de
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|September 24, 2008
Summary
Computer-generated fixed partial dentures (FPDs) using optical impressions show reduced strain development compared to conventional methods. This indicates a passive fit comparable to traditional techniques, improving implant-supported restorations.
Area of Science:
- Dental prosthetics
- Biomaterials engineering
- Digital dentistry
Background:
- Achieving passive fit in implant-supported restorations is challenging with current fabrication methods.
- Strain development during superstructure fabrication can compromise restoration longevity and implant stability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare strain development in computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated from optical impressions versus conventionally fabricated FPDs.
- To evaluate the passive fit of CAD/CAM-generated FPDs in implant-supported restorations.
Main Methods:
- A measurement model with two implants was used, with strain gauges placed mesially and distally.
- Three groups of FPDs were fabricated: conventional (repositioning impression), conventional (pick-up impression), and CAD/CAM (optical impression).
- Strain development during FPD fixation was recorded and analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).
Main Results:
- CAD/CAM-fabricated FPDs exhibited significantly lower strain development compared to those made from pick-up impressions (P = .01).
- No significant difference in strain development was found between CAD/CAM FPDs and those made from repositioning impressions (P = .19).
- Conventionally fabricated FPDs showed no significant difference in strain development between the two impression techniques (P = .07).
Conclusions:
- Restorations fabricated using optical impressions achieve a passive fit comparable to conventional methods.
- CAD/CAM technology offers a promising approach to minimize strain in implant-supported FPDs.
- This study supports the use of optical impressions for fabricating passive-fitting implant restorations.