Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Wireless Telemetry Device Implantation in a Fontan Ovine Model for Continuous and Long-Term Hemodynamic Monitoring
Published on: May 2, 2025
Long-term follow-up for superior vena cava filter placement
Fred Usoh1, Anil Hingorani, Enrico Ascher
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 11219, USA.
Superior vena cava (SVC) filter placement is safe and effective for treating upper extremity deep venous thrombosis when anticoagulation is contraindicated. Long-term follow-up revealed a low complication rate, reaffirming its utility.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Radiology
- Cardiology
Background:
- Short-term effectiveness and safety of superior vena cava (SVC) filters for upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) in patients with anticoagulation contraindications are established.
- Limited long-term follow-up data exist for SVC filter placement, unlike the more extensively studied inferior vena cava filters.
- This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes and complications of SVC filter placement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of superior vena cava (SVC) filter placement.
- To identify insertion and long-term complications associated with SVC filters.
- To provide data on the durability and clinical outcomes of SVC filters in patients with UEDVT.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 154 patients who underwent SVC filter placement between January 1994 and August 2005.
- Data collected on insertion complications (pneumothorax, hemorrhage, misplacement) and long-term complications (pulmonary embolism, migration, caval occlusion).
- Follow-up included chest radiographs, patient charts, clinic visits, telephone contacts, and death records.
Main Results:
- All 154 SVC filters (TrapEase and Greenfield) were successfully deployed.
- Low incidence of complications: three cases of pericardial tamponade (1.9%) and one misplaced filter.
- No cases of symptomatic pulmonary embolism, caval occlusion, pneumothorax, or filter migration were observed; 74% mortality due to underlying conditions.
Conclusions:
- Superior vena cava (SVC) filter placement demonstrates a low incidence of complications during long-term follow-up.
- The findings reaffirm the safety and effectiveness of SVC filters for indicated patients.
- SVC perforation in young males remains a notable concern requiring further investigation.
More Related Videos
05:51Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
Published on: January 13, 2026
07:47The Supraclavicular Fossa Ultrasound View for Central Venous Catheter Placement and Catheter Change Over Guidewire
Published on: December 23, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis I: Introduction