Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
Inclusive Fitness00:57

Inclusive Fitness

Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
Microbial Interactions: Mutualism01:25

Microbial Interactions: Mutualism

Mutualism is a symbiotic interaction in which all participating organisms benefit. These relationships can be obligate or facultative and are fundamental to ecosystem functions across diverse biological systems.Plant–Fungi MutualismOne well-known example is the association between plant roots and mycorrhizal fungi, such as Rhizophagus species. The fungal hyphae penetrate the root hairs and the epidermis, forming an extensive hyphal network that establishes a symbiotic association. Through this...
Altruism01:03

Altruism

Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation01:26

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamic games and conditional strategies.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same author

Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

Mutualism among safe, selfish sentinels: a dynamic game.

P A Bednekoff1

  • 1Institute of Applied Mathematics and Centre for Biodiversity Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z2, Canada.

The American Naturalist
|September 25, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Individual selfish actions can create coordinated sentinel behavior in groups. This dynamic game model shows that sentinels benefit from antipredator vigilance when others forage, leading to apparent group coordination.

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Game Theory
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Animal groups often exhibit sentinel behavior, with individuals watching for predators.
  • Sentinel activity appears organized, with consistent numbers rather than extremes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if observed sentinel behavior patterns arise from individual selfish motivations.
  • To model the dynamics of sentinel behavior using a game theory approach.

Main Methods:

  • A dynamic game model was developed where individuals choose between foraging and sentineling.
  • Individual decisions were based on energetic state and the actions of other group members.
  • The model incorporated selfish benefits for sentinels and information transfer within the group.

Main Results:

  • Selfish individual choices can lead to highly coordinated sentinel behavior under specific conditions.
  • Apparent coordination emerged from mutualism, where individuals benefited from others' sentinel duties.
  • Model robustness was high, though sentinel behavior levels varied with foraging and predation parameters.

Conclusions:

  • Sentinel behavior can be an emergent property of individual self-interest within a group.
  • The study highlights the interplay between individual benefits and group-level coordination.
  • Further empirical testing is recommended for model assumptions regarding sentinel safety and information flow.