Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Competition in a group of equal foragers
1Integrative Ecology Unit, Division of Population Biology, Department of Ecology and Systematics, P.O. Box 17 (Arkadiankatu 7), FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
The American Naturalist
|September 25, 2008
Summary
Group foraging may not evolve for food alone. Models show solitary foragers can have less gain variation than group members, challenging foraging benefits of grouping behavior.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Behavioral Ecology
- Mathematical Biology
Background:
- Foraging behavior is central to animal ecology.
- Group living is common, but its benefits, especially in foraging, are debated.
- Understanding gain accumulation in different social contexts is key.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a stochastic model of gain accumulation for competitors in a patchy environment.
- To analyze how group size and patch variability affect individual foraging gains and correlations.
- To compare the foraging efficiency and gain variance of solitary versus group foragers.
Main Methods:
- Utilized renewal process theory to model individual gain based on prey encounter waiting times.
- Developed a model where waiting times depend on the number of foragers, parameterized by a single variable.
- Analyzed the impact of constant versus variable patch sizes on gain correlations.
Main Results:
- Negative correlations in gains between foragers occur in constant patch sizes, strongest in small groups.
- Positive gain correlations emerge with increased patch size variation, regardless of group size.
- Individual gain variance increases monotonically in groups, unlike solitary foragers where it decreases over time.
Conclusions:
- Solitary foragers may achieve lower gain variance than group members, depending on patch departure rules.
- The potential for solitary foragers to deplete patches further questions the sole evolutionary advantage of foraging groups.
- Grouping behavior's evolution may rely on factors beyond simple foraging efficiency.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Competition
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.Intraspecific competition, which occurs between individuals of the same species, serves as a natural mechanism for regulating population size. Too much...
Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Ecological Niches
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.Multiple species cannot occupy the exact same niche within their habitat. If the niches of two or more species overlap to a large extent, the competitive exclusion principle dictates that one species will outcompete the other, forcing it to...
Microbial Interactions: Competition
Microbial competition is an ecological interaction in which microorganisms vie for limited resources within shared environments. These resources may include nutrients, space, or light, depending on the system. The intensity and outcome of competition are influenced by the environmental context, such as nutrient availability, spatial constraints, and the diversity of microbial species present. These competitive interactions significantly influence the structure, function, and resilience of...
In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
