Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This number is...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the test...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
Unusual Results01:16

Unusual Results

Unusual results are those that have a very low chance of occurring. Unusual results can be identified using probabilities and the range rule of thumb. In problems involving probability, unusual results can be observed in 2 instances – an unusually high number of successes or an unusually low number of successes.
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ  from the mean, μ  is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value = μ + 2σ
Minimum unusual value...
Outliers and Influential Points01:08

Outliers and Influential Points

An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the vertical...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Statistics and AI - A Fireside Conversation.

Harvard data science review·2026
Same author

Principled and interpretable alignability testing and integration of single-cell data.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

The science of deep learning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2020
Same author

Component-wise gradient boosting and false discovery control in survival analysis with high-dimensional covariates.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2015
Same author

COVARIANCE ASSISTED SCREENING AND ESTIMATION.

Annals of statistics·2014
Same author

A GENERALIZED FOURIER APPROACH TO ESTIMATING THE NULL PARAMETERS AND PROPORTION OF NONNULL EFFECTS IN LARGE-SCALE MULTIPLE TESTING.

Journal of statistical research·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Higher criticism thresholding: Optimal feature selection when useful features are rare and weak.

David Donoho1, Jiashun Jin

  • 1Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. donoho@stat.standord.edu

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|September 26, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Higher Criticism thresholding (HCT) offers improved feature selection for linear classification, especially in rare/weak feature models. This method enhances classifier performance by controlling missed features better than false discovery rate thresholding (FDRT).

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Statistical Learning
  • Bioinformatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Effective feature selection is critical for linear classification analysis in fields like genomics and proteomics.
  • Traditional methods may struggle with rare/weak features, where useful signals are subtle and infrequent.
  • Existing threshold selection procedures like False Discovery Rate Thresholding (FDRT) have limitations in challenging scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate Higher Criticism thresholding (HCT) for feature selection in linear classification.
  • To compare HCT with existing methods, particularly FDRT, under rare/weak (RW) feature models.
  • To assess the impact of HCT on classifier performance, error rates, and threshold selection stability.

Main Methods:

  • Feature selection via thresholding of Z-scores based on the Higher Criticism (HC) objective function.
  • The HC threshold maximizes (i/p - pi((i)))/sqrt{i/p(1-i/p)}, where pi((i)) are ordered P-values.
  • Comparison of HCT with FDRT and cross-validation in Shrunken Centroid classifiers using real datasets and asymptotic theory.

Main Results:

  • HCT demonstrates an intimate link between maximizing the HC objective and minimizing classifier error rates in RW settings.
  • HCT utilizes lower thresholds than FDRT in challenging RW scenarios, improving control over missed features.
  • Replacing cross-validation with HCT in Shrunken Centroid classifiers reduces threshold variance and misclassification error.

Conclusions:

  • Higher Criticism thresholding (HCT) provides a computationally efficient and simpler alternative for feature selection.
  • HCT offers superior performance over FDRT in rare/weak feature models, leading to more accurate classifiers.
  • The study confirms the advantages of HCT in both theoretical analysis and practical applications on real datasets.