Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026
Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Cone-shaped Double-hole Method with Dual-plane Probe Guidance
Published on: June 6, 2025
Diagnosis of prostate cancer: repeated transrectal prostate biopsy or transurethral resection
Chih-Chieh Lin1, William J S Huang, Li-Ju Wu
1Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Background:
Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate is the major method by which prostate cancer is diagnosed. However, many patients might be overlooked with the initial biopsy. Not uncommonly, patients need repeated biopsies when they continue to exhibit suspicious clinical signs. This may cause psychological stress to both patients and doctors. The purpose of this study was to determine how many repeat transrectal biopsies are adequate for prostate cancer detection and when to switch to transurethral resection.
Methods:
We retrospectively studied a cohort of 2,996 patients who had undergone prostate biopsy. If the biopsy specimen was negative for malignancy, patients were given the choice of either being managed with observation or undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) if indicated. If there was a high suspicion of cancer, patients were advised to undergo additional biopsies. The primary endpoint of this study was a diagnosis of cancer.
Results:
The cancer detection rate was 22.9% (685 of 2,996 patients) in specimens taken during the first transrectal biopsy, 8.7% in those taken during the second biopsy (32 of 336 patients), and 6.1% in those taken during the third biopsy (6 of 98 patients). The cancer detection rate of TURP after 1 negative biopsy result was 9.3% (35 of 375 patients), and that after 2 negative biopsy results was 17.1% (6 of 35 patients). TURP-derived specimens that were pathologically diagnosed as malignant had lower Gleason grade on average, no matter how many repeat biopsies there were in patients whose previous transrectal biopsy specimens were negative for malignancy (p=0.002 for 2 negative biopsy results and p=0.007 for 3 negative biopsy results).
Conclusion:
The chance of detecting malignancy beyond a third transrectal biopsy procedure is low. TURP, therefore, might be an alternative procedure for obtaining tissue for pathologic diagnosis, especially in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen levels and comorbid illnesses such as obstructive symptoms.
