Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Correction: Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same author

Staff training to improve participant recruitment into surgical randomised controlled trials: A feasibility study within a trial (SWAT) across four host trials simultaneously.

Research methods in medicine & health sciences·2026
Same author

Challenges and solutions to the implementation of studies within a trial: The experiences of the PROMETHEUS programme.

Research methods in medicine & health sciences·2026
Same author

Correction: A meta-analysis of previous falls and subsequent fracture risk in cohort studies.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same author

Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026

Related Experiment Videos

Potential for technical errors and subverted allocation can be reduced if certain guidelines are followed: examples

Catherine E Hewitt1, David J Torgerson, Vance W Berger

  • 1York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom. ceh121@york.ac.uk

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|October 1, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Researchers reported manipulation and technical errors in randomized controlled trials, often due to participant or staff pressure and lack of knowledge. Many instances of trial subversion went unreported in publications.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Research Methodology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating interventions.
  • Ensuring the integrity of the randomization process is crucial for the validity of RCTs.
  • Subversion of randomization can lead to biased results and flawed conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore researchers' experiences and knowledge regarding the undermining of randomization processes in clinical trials.
  • To identify common methods and reasons for randomization manipulation.
  • To document the occurrence and types of technical errors in randomization.

Main Methods:

  • A web-based survey was distributed in February 2006.
  • The survey targeted individuals involved in any aspect of randomized controlled trials.
  • A convenience sample of respondents was utilized.

Main Results:

  • Thirty survey responses detailed incidences of manipulation, with seven identified reasons including participant interest, efficacy demonstration, and pressure.
  • Manipulation was frequently discovered but rarely reported in trial publications.
  • Twenty-three responses reported technical errors in both the generation and implementation phases of randomization.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides evidence of trial subversion and highlights the potential for reducing technical errors.
  • Implementing specific guidelines can minimize randomization errors.
  • Recommendations include using simple randomization, third-party allocation, pre-testing software, and ensuring awareness of backup procedures.