Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...

Ethical Issues

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Considering the precautionary principle and its application to MRSA and SARS-CoV-2 as emerging novel pathogens of their time.

Infection, disease & health·2022

Same author

An Australian interpretive description of Contact Precautions through a bioethical lens; recommendations for ethically improved practice.

American journal of infection control·2022

Same author

Invasive experimental brain surgery for dementia: Ethical shifts in clinical research practices?

Bioethics·2021

Same author

The modern hospital executive, micro improvements, and the rise of antimicrobial resistance.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2021

Same author

Ethics and Policy for Bioprinting.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2020

Same author

Emotional touchpoints; the feelings nurses have about explaining multi-resistant organisms to colonised patients.

Infection, disease & health·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering

Published on: September 16, 2016

Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.

Renee Kyle¹, Susan Dodds

¹University of Wollongong, Gwynneville, 2522, NSW, Australia. rkyle@uow.edu.au

Science and Engineering Ethics

|October 1, 2008

Summary

Public engagement with nanotechnology is crucial despite limited awareness. Effective communication strategies involving researchers, policymakers, and consumers are vital for informed technological development and policy.

More Related Videos

Testing of Nanoparticle Release from a Composite Containing Nanomaterial Using a Chamber System

Testing of Nanoparticle Release from a Composite Containing Nanomaterial Using a Chamber System

Published on: November 22, 2016

Fine-tuning the Size and Minimizing the Noise of Solid-state Nanopores

Fine-tuning the Size and Minimizing the Noise of Solid-state Nanopores

Published on: October 31, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering

Published on: September 16, 2016

Testing of Nanoparticle Release from a Composite Containing Nanomaterial Using a Chamber System

Testing of Nanoparticle Release from a Composite Containing Nanomaterial Using a Chamber System

Published on: November 22, 2016

Fine-tuning the Size and Minimizing the Noise of Solid-state Nanopores

Fine-tuning the Size and Minimizing the Noise of Solid-state Nanopores

Published on: October 31, 2013

Area of Science:

Nanotechnology
Science Communication
Public Policy

Background:

Limited public awareness and understanding of nanotechnology persist despite significant public investment.
Nanotechnology is poised to revolutionize daily life, necessitating public discourse.
Existing literature on public engagement and science policy informs the need for broader societal involvement.

Purpose of the Study:

To articulate the importance of public engagement in nanotechnology debates.
To explore the critical role of timing in public engagement initiatives.
To propose effective strategies for engaging the public on technological advancements.

Main Methods:

Literature review on public engagement, science policy, and public deliberation.
Analysis of the significance of timing in public engagement.
Development of recommendations for effective public engagement strategies.

Main Results:

Public engagement is essential for navigating the societal implications of nanotechnology.
The timing of engagement significantly influences its effectiveness.
Successful engagement requires collaboration between scientific researchers, policymakers, and consumer groups.

Conclusions:

Effective public reasoning is key to developing a robust policy framework for nanotechnology.
Involving scientific researchers, policymakers, and consumer representatives is crucial for informed public debate.
Proactive and strategic public engagement can foster a more informed and participatory approach to technological development.