Shoulder function after harvesting a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026
An Experimental Human DIEP Flap Model to Investigate Preservation Strategies for Vascularized Composite Allografts and Free Flaps
Published on: December 5, 2025
Moustapha Hamdi1, Tina Decorte, Martine Demuynck
1Ghent, Belgium From the Plastic Surgery Department, the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, the Medical Informatics and Statistics Department, and the Gynecology Department, Ghent University Hospital.
Background:
Converting the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap to a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap has been reported for breast reconstruction. The goal of this article is to evaluate the donor site after harvesting a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in patients who underwent breast surgery and to show the advantages of sparing the latissimus dorsi muscle on the function of the shoulder.
Methods:
Between 2002 and 2004, 22 patients who had a partial breast reconstruction using a pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator flap were enrolled in a functional study to evaluate shoulder function postoperatively. Latissimus dorsi muscle strength, shoulder mobility, and latissimus dorsi thickness were measured by using the MicroFet2, a goniometer, and ultrasound examination, respectively. The measurements of the operated and contralateral (unoperated) sides were analyzed statistically.
Results:
When comparing the operated sides to the unoperated sides, latissimus dorsi strength seemed to be maintained after surgery. Shoulder mobility was also similar in all movements, but both active and passive forward elevation and passive abduction were reduced significantly after surgery, and latissimus dorsi thickness was not affected by harvesting the thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps. No seroma formation was found in any of the donor sites.
Conclusions:
Donor-site morbidity after harvesting a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap was reduced to a minimum. Therefore, perforator flaps should be considered in reconstruction whenever adequate perforators can be identified and safely dissected.
