Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Cardiac resynchronization therapy: dyssynchrony imaging from a heart failure perspective
John G F Cleland1, Damien Cullington, Olga Khaleva
1Department of Cardiology, University of Hull, Kingston-upon-Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, UK. j.g.cleland@hull.ac.uk
Insights
Current imaging techniques do not predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Clinical assessment is the most effective method for patient selection for CRT, potentially improving outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a treatment for heart failure.
- Patient selection for CRT is crucial for optimal outcomes.
- The role of imaging in guiding CRT patient selection is under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the evidence supporting and refuting the use of imaging for selecting patients for CRT.
- To determine if imaging can predict clinical response to CRT.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing evidence on imaging modalities for CRT patient selection.
- Analysis of studies correlating imaging parameters with CRT response.
- Comparison of imaging-based selection with clinical assessment.
Main Results:
- No evidence supports the use of QRS interval or imaging-measured dyssynchrony for predicting CRT response in dilated cardiomyopathy.
- Clinical evaluation is the most reliable method for selecting patients for CRT.
- Specific patient characteristics like low blood pressure and moderate mitral regurgitation may indicate greater benefit from CRT.
- The added benefit of a defibrillator with CRT is modest and uncertain.
Conclusions:
- Echocardiography may hinder rather than help appropriate CRT implementation.
- Cardiac dyssynchrony measured by echocardiography might not be the basis for CRT's therapeutic effects.
Purpose Of Review:
To review the evidence for and against imaging as a means of selecting patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Recent Findings:
There is no evidence that either the QRS interval on the surface ECG or dyssynchrony measured by imaging is of any practical value in predicting the clinical response to CRT in patients with a dilated and dysfunctional left ventricle. Careful assessment of the patient, so that therapy can be logically aligned with treatment goals, such as improving symptoms or prognosis, is the only useful method for selecting patients. Simple clinical evaluation may be as effective as, or more effective than, more complex assessments in predicting treatment benefits. Patients with a low blood pressure and moderate functional mitral regurgitation might benefit more, in absolute terms, from CRT. The benefits of adding a defibrillator to CRT are modest and, for many patients, uncertain.
Summary:
Echocardiography, which was supposed to facilitate the introduction of CRT, may have become the greatest barrier to its appropriate implementation. Cardiac dyssynchrony, measured by echocardiography prior to implantation, may not be the substrate for the effects of CRT.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

