Differences in ischemia-reperfusion-induced endothelial changes in hearts perfused at constant flow and constant

Raja B Singh1, Vijayan Elimban, Naranjan S Dhalla

  • 1Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, St. Boniface General Hospital Research Centre, 351 Tache Ave., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R2H 2A6.

Insights

Ischemia-reperfusion injury causes greater cardiac dysfunction in hearts perfused at constant flow (CF) versus constant pressure (CP). This difference is linked to more significant endothelial dysfunction and altered subcellular function in CF-perfused hearts.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Physiology
  • Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
  • Cardiac Mechanics

Background:

  • Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury impairs cardiac performance and subcellular functions.
  • Differences in contractile responses to I/R exist between constant flow (CF) and constant pressure (CP) perfusion methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanisms behind I/R-induced alterations in CF-perfused and CP-perfused rat hearts.
  • To compare cardiac function, sarcolemmal Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity, sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) uptake, and endothelial function between CF and CP perfusion during I/R.

Main Methods:

  • Isolated rat hearts were perfused at either CF (10 ml/min) or CP (80 mmHg).
  • Hearts underwent 30 minutes of global ischemia followed by 60 minutes of reperfusion.
  • Cardiac function, sarcolemmal Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity, sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) uptake, calpain activity, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) protein content were assessed.

Main Results:

  • I/R caused greater depression in cardiac function, SL Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase, and SR Ca(2+) uptake in CF-perfused hearts compared to CP-perfused hearts.
  • CF-perfused hearts showed increased calpain activity, decreased eNOS protein, and reduced nitric oxide (NO) levels post-I/R compared to CP-perfused hearts.
  • L-arginine attenuated I/R effects in CF hearts, while N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester exacerbated them in CP hearts.

Conclusions:

  • Greater I/R-induced cardiac dysfunction in CF-perfused hearts is partly due to more pronounced endothelial dysfunction.
  • Differences in perfusion methods significantly impact the response to I/R injury at both the organ and subcellular levels.

Related Concept Videos