Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence for two systems mediating perceived contrast.

J R Brannan1, I Bodis-Wollner

  • 1Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai Medical School, City University of New York, NY 10029.

Visual Neuroscience
|June 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Abstracts of Presentations at the International Conference on Basic and Clinical Multimodal Imaging (BaCI), a Joint Conference of the International Society for Neuroimaging in Psychiatry (ISNIP), the International Society for Functional Source Imaging (ISFSI), the International Society for Bioelectromagnetism (ISBEM), the International Society for Brain Electromagnetic Topography (ISBET), and the EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society (ECNS), in Geneva, Switzerland, September 5-8, 2013.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2013
Same author

Remodeling of the fovea in Parkinson disease.

Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)·2012
Same author

Cortical control of saccades in Parkinson disease and essential tremor.

Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)·2012
Same author

Cortical control of voluntary saccades in Parkinson's disease and pre-emptive perception.

Parkinsonism & related disorders·2011
Same author

Cognitive neurophysiology of Parkinson disease.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2010
Same author

Perisaccadic gamma modulation in Parkinson disease patients and healthy subjects.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2010
Same journal

Support for the efficient coding account of visual discomfort.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Visual Field Asymmetries in Responses to ON and OFF Pathway Biasing Stimuli.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Pattern reversal chromatic VEPs like onsets, are unaffected by attentional demand.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

The interaction between luminance polarity grouping and symmetry axes on the ERP responses to symmetry.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Electroretinographic responses to periodic stimuli in primates and the relevance for visual perception and for clinical studies.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Synaptotagmin-9 in mouse retina.

Visual neuroscience·2024
See all related articles

Psychophysical studies reveal two distinct systems for perceiving visual contrast. These systems show a clear boundary effect, with sharpest discrimination occurring between 10-15% contrast levels.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Psychophysics
  • Sensory systems

Background:

  • Perceived contrast is crucial for visual tasks.
  • Understanding the underlying neural mechanisms of contrast perception is an ongoing challenge.
  • Previous research suggests non-linearities in contrast processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate psychophysical evidence for distinct systems in contrast perception.
  • To identify potential boundaries or transitions in contrast sensitivity.
  • To explore the relationship between contrast levels and perceptual judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Psychophysical experiments involving contrast discrimination tasks.
  • Sinusoidal gratings at 2.3 cycles per degree were used as stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Observers rated contrast relative to "high" and "low" standards, with varying ranges.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant boundary effect was observed in contrast judgments.
    • Contrast discrimination was sharpest at the 10-15% contrast range.
    • Perceptual judgments were influenced by whether tested ranges included this critical boundary.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support a categorical dichotomy in contrast perception.
    • Evidence suggests two distinct visual systems: one for low contrast (<10%) and another for high contrast (>15%).
    • These systems likely operate through different neural pathways or mechanisms.