Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Transforaminal Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy Under Local Anesthesia for L5/S1 Adjacent Segment Foraminal Stenosis
Published on: October 17, 2025
Effectiveness of a mucolythic agent as a local adjuvant in revision lumbar spine surgery
Vincenzo Denaro1, Alberto Di Martino, Umile Giuseppe Longo
1Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Biomedico University, Via Longoni, 83, 00155, Rome, Italy.
Abstract:
Aim of this prospective randomized trial was to analyze the effectiveness of MESNA in chemical dissection of peridural fibrosis in patients who underwent revision lumbar spine surgery. Between January 2003 and October 2006, 30 patients who underwent revision lumbar spine surgery were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a study group (A) and a control group (B). Once peridural fibrosis was exposed, MESNA (Uromixetan MESNA, 50 mg/ml) was intraoperatively applied on the fibrous tissue (Group A) to ease tissue dissection and enter the canal. In patients of Group B, saline solution was used. Surgical time, preoperative and 1 week postoperative hemoglobin (Hb), length of hospitalization (days), and incidence of perioperative complications were evaluated. The blinded surgeon assigned the surgeries to one of four categories as none, minimal, moderate, and severe basing on intraoperative difficulty in dissecting the fibrous tissue and intraoperative bleeding. Statistical analysis used chi-square analysis to evaluate the difference in surgery difficulty and the incidence of intraoperative complications between the two groups. The analysis of surgical time and hemoglobin levels was performed using a one-sample Wilcoxon test and Mann-Whitney U test. Patients in whom MESNA was used intraoperatively (Group A) presented better intraoperative and perioperative parameters with respect to the control group. Average surgical time and decrease in Hb postoperatively were more in the saline group (B) respect to MESNA (A) (P = 0.004 and P = 0.001, respectively), while no difference in average hospital stay was reported between the two groups. Surgeon-blinded intraoperative report on surgical difficulty showed a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, no complications directly attributable to the use of MESNA were experienced. The incidence of dural tears and intraoperative bleeding from epidural veins were significantly less in Group A with respect to the control group. MESNA contributed significantly to reduce the operative complications, with a diminution of the surgical time and the grade of difficult for the surgeon, confirming its ability as chemical dissector also for epidural fibrosis in revision lumbar spine surgery.
Insights
MESNA effectively aids in chemical dissection of peridural fibrosis during revision lumbar spine surgery. This agent significantly reduces surgical time and intraoperative bleeding compared to saline, improving surgeon ease and patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Spinal Surgery
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Peridural fibrosis is a common complication after lumbar spine surgery, often necessitating revision procedures.
- Revision lumbar spine surgery presents challenges due to scar tissue, increasing operative difficulty and complication rates.
- Effective methods for dissecting peridural fibrosis are crucial for improving surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of MESNA as a chemical dissector for peridural fibrosis in revision lumbar spine surgery.
- To compare surgical parameters and complication rates between patients treated with MESNA and those treated with saline.
- To assess the impact of MESNA on surgical difficulty and intraoperative bleeding.
Main Methods:
- A prospective randomized trial involving 30 patients undergoing revision lumbar spine surgery.
- Patients were assigned to receive either MESNA (Group A) or saline (Group B) for intraoperative application to peridural fibrosis.
- Evaluated parameters included surgical time, hemoglobin levels, hospitalization length, and incidence of complications. Surgeon-blinded assessment of surgical difficulty was performed.
Main Results:
- MESNA group (A) showed significantly reduced average surgical time and postoperative hemoglobin decrease compared to the saline group (B) (P = 0.004 and P = 0.001).
- Surgeon-blinded reports indicated significantly less intraoperative difficulty in the MESNA group (P < 0.05).
- The incidence of dural tears and epidural venous bleeding was significantly lower in the MESNA group.
Conclusions:
- MESNA serves as an effective chemical dissector for peridural fibrosis in revision lumbar spine surgery.
- Intraoperative use of MESNA contributes to reduced surgical time, decreased bleeding, and improved ease of dissection.
- MESNA demonstrates a favorable safety profile with no observed complications directly attributable to its use.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs Used in Upper Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Antihistamines (e.g., Benadryl) block histamines from binding. Histamines are chemicals released during an allergic reaction in the body. As a...
Upper Respiratory Drugs: Antitussives, Expectorants, and Mucolytics
Antitussives include codeine, dextromethorphan (Robitussin), and benzonatate (Tessalon). Codeine and dextromethorphan exert their effects centrally by suppressing the cough reflex center in the medulla. Benzonatate operates peripherally within the respiratory tract by anesthetizing...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
