Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

26:41
Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
Why science cannot stand alone
1University of Chicago Divinity School, Swift Hall 202, 1025 E. 58th St., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. jbelshta@midway.uchicago.edu
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
|October 14, 2008
Summary
Believing in science requires ethical boundaries, not unchecked autonomy. Historical examples show that without moral limits, scientific pursuits can lead to a dangerous "will to power" and the silencing of public concerns.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- History of Science
- Political Philosophy
Background:
- Scientific research faces increasing controversy and demands for autonomy.
- The concept of
- believing in science" is critically examined in this era.", "Unfettered scientific freedom can lead to ethical concerns."], 3. "Purpose_of_the_Study": ["To critically evaluate the notion of "believing in science" and its implications.", "To explore the dominance of science and the silencing of moral voices.", "To analyze historical and contemporary examples of scientific autonomy and its consequences."], 4. "Main_Methods": ["Critical evaluation of the concept of scientific belief.", "Historical investigation into National Socialist Germany
- applied biology.
- Analysis of contemporary American biomedical practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the notion of
- believing in science" and its implications.", "To explore the dominance of science and the silencing of moral voices.", "To analyze historical and contemporary examples of scientific autonomy and its consequences."], 5. "Main_Methods": ["Critical evaluation of the concept of scientific belief.", "Historical investigation into National Socialist Germany
- applied biology.
- Analysis of contemporary American biomedical practices.
Main Methods:
- Critical evaluation of the concept of scientific belief.
- Historical investigation into National Socialist Germany's
- applied biology.
- Analysis of contemporary American biomedical practices.
Main Results:
- Unfettered scientific autonomy, as seen in Nazi Germany, can lead to a dangerous
- will to power.
- Contemporary American biomedicine also raises questions about ethical boundaries.
- Moral voices and public deliberation are often silenced when scientific pursuits lack ethical oversight.
Conclusions:
- Believing in science
- should not equate to unconditional scientific autonomy.
- Ethical deliberation and public input are crucial for guiding scientific application.
- Setting limits on medical science and scientific goals is essential for societal well-being.
Related Concept Videos
The Scientific Method
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
Scientific Laws and Theories
Scientific Laws
Psychology as a Science
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...

