African American and non-Hispanic white children's health: integrating alternative explanations

Godwin S Ashiabi1

  • 1Department of Human Development, California State University, Hayward, CA, USA. godwin.ashiabi@csueastbay.edu

Ethnicity & Health
|October 14, 2008
PubMed

Insights

Racial disparities in child health are influenced by socioeconomic status (SES) and quality of care. Parental factors and health insurance impact health outcomes, with some differences observed between Black and White children.

Area of Science:

  • Child health disparities research
  • Health services research
  • Structural equation modeling

Background:

  • Socioeconomic status (SES) is a significant determinant of child health.
  • Understanding racial and ethnic differences in health outcomes is crucial.
  • Parental psychological resources and access to care influence child well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine if a structural equation model (SEM) of child health applies similarly across Black and White children.
  • To investigate differences in item indicators and structural paths across racial groups.
  • To identify how family resources, sociocultural factors, structural factors, and parental psychological resources influence child health status.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from 18,092 Black and White children (ages 0-11) from the 2002 National Survey of American Families.
  • Employed a two-stage, eight-step multigroup SEM to analyze associations among key variables.
  • Assessed the structural model's applicability and differences across racial groups.

Main Results:

  • The SEM's overall structure applied similarly to Black and White children, though some factor loadings differed.
  • Sociocultural, structural, and parental psychological resources mediated the SES-health link, with differing effects of SES on mediators but not on health status itself.
  • Health insurance increased health care use more among Black children; quality of care perception was more strongly linked to better health in Black children.

Conclusions:

  • SES effects on child health status are not significantly different between racial groups when accounting for sociocultural, structural, and parental psychological factors.
  • Perception of quality of care is a key factor in health care utilization, influenced by health insurance and SES.
  • Parental depression and parenting behaviors significantly influence care perception and health care utilization decisions.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Concepts of Health and Illness01:29

Concepts of Health and Illness

Health is a condition of the body, mind, and spirit where an individual remains free from illness. Similarly, wellness is an active state, including living a lifestyle that promotes physical, mental, and emotional health. Physical health is critical for the overall well-being and can be affected by lifestyle, activity level, diet, and behavior. The highest attainable standard of health is a fundamental and universal human right. Consider Lisa, a fifteen-year-old born with congenital...
Dimensions of Health and Illness01:21

Dimensions of Health and Illness

The factors influencing the health-illness continuum can be internal or external and may or may not be under conscious control. They are related to the following eight human dimensions, and each dimension is interrelated to one other.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts: