Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

A Competent Hepatocyte Model Examining Hepatitis B Virus Entry through Sodium Taurocholate Cotransporting Polypeptide as a Therapeutic Target
Published on: May 10, 2022
A cost-effectiveness analysis of currently approved treatments for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B
D Eldon Spackman1, David L Veenstra
1Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Insights
Comparing treatments for hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB), entecavir and pegylated interferon offer the greatest clinical and economic value. These therapies demonstrate superior cost-effectiveness for managing CHB.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Public Health
Background:
- Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) affects numerous individuals globally.
- Several pharmaceuticals are approved for treating hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB.
- The comparative economic value of these treatments remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a cost-utility analysis comparing the economic value of adefovir, entecavir, lamivudine, pegylated interferon, and telbivudine.
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different treatment initiation strategies for HBeAg-positive CHB from a US payer perspective.
Main Methods:
- A Markov model-based cost-utility analysis was performed over a lifetime horizon.
- Data on disease progression, costs, and quality of life were sourced from existing literature.
- Sensitivity analyses, including probabilistic sensitivity analysis, were utilized to assess result uncertainty.
Main Results:
- Entecavir and pegylated interferon demonstrated the largest treatment benefits in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
- At a threshold of $50,000 per QALY, entecavir had a 57% probability of being cost-effective, followed by pegylated interferon (37%).
- Treatment initiation strategies significantly impacted outcomes, with results sensitive to baseline seroconversion rates and viral suppression effects on cirrhosis risk.
Conclusions:
- Initiating treatment for HBeAg-positive CHB with entecavir or pegylated interferon offers significant clinical and economic advantages.
- Favorable combinations of seroconversion, viral suppression, and resistance profiles are key to maximizing treatment value.
- These findings support informed decision-making for managing HBeAg-positive CHB.
Background:
A variety of pharmaceuticals are currently approved for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but their relative economic value is unclear. The goal of this analysis was to compare the cost effectiveness of adefovir, entecavir, lamivudine, pegylated interferon and telbivudine.
Methods:
We conducted a cost-utility analysis from a US payer perspective over a lifetime time horizon using a Markov model, in a hypothetical population with HBeAg-positive CHB and a mean age of 35 years. Disease progression probabilities, costs and quality-of-life data were derived from the literature. We assumed a treatment duration of 4 years, with the use of combination therapy for drug resistance. Nonresponders to pegylated interferon were assumed to receive entecavir in years 3-4. Sensitivity analyses, including probabilistic sensitivity analysis, were conducted to evaluate uncertainty in the results. All costs were valued in $US, year 2008 values. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum.
Results:
The 10-year cumulative incidence of cirrhosis for no treatment was 26.1%, and ranged from 19.7% to 23.8% with treatment; undiscounted life-years were 36.2 for no treatment, or ranged from 36.82 to 37.54 with treatment. Initiation with entecavir (18.70 QALYs) and pegylated interferon (18.64 QALYs) provided the largest treatment benefits overall, followed by telbivudine (18.55 QALYs). The probabilities of the interventions being cost effective at a threshold of USD 50,000 per QALY were 57%, 37% and 2% for initiation with entecavir, pegylated interferon and telbivudine, respectively. The results were dependent on baseline seroconversion rate and the effect of viral suppression on cirrhosis risk.
Conclusions:
Initiation of treatments for HBeAg-positive CHB with a favourable combination of seroconversion, viral suppression and resistance profile appear to offer the greatest clinical and economic value.
Related Concept Videos
Hepatitis
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Viral Hepatitis I: Introduction
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
