Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Introducing the Naturalistic Expression Labeling Task (NELT): Associations with posed expression labeling, empathy, and general cognitive ability.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

Recovery of depth perception in adults with abnormal binocular vision.

Vision research·2026

Same author

Evaluating Increment and Decrement Stimuli Responses in Patients with Glaucoma Using Virtual Reality-Based Perimetry.

Ophthalmology science·2025

Same author

No Evidence of Reliability Across 36 Variations of the Emotional Dot-Probe Task in 9,600 Participants.

Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2025

Same author

Pilot study comparing a new virtual reality-based visual field test to standard perimetry in children.

Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus·2024

Same author

Multiracial Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (MRMET): An inclusive version of an influential measure.

Behavior research methods·2024

Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026

Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026

Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026

Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026

Same journal

The frustration of a small <i>n</i>.

Perception·2026

Same journal

Why do we have two eyes.

Perception·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

Self-reported Magic Eye stereogram skill predicts stereoacuity.

Jeremy B Wilmer¹, Benjamin T Backus

¹Vision Sciences, SUNY State College of Optometry, 33 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036, USA. jwilmer@sunyopt.edu

|October 16, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Self-reported Magic Eye stereogram (MES) skill strongly predicts stereoacuity. Poor MES skill indicates a higher risk of stereo impairment and requires greater binocular disparity for depth perception.

More Related Videos

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

Area of Science:

Vision science
Ophthalmology
Perceptual psychology

Background:

Autostereograms, or Magic Eye stereograms (MESs), are 2D images enabling stereoscopic depth perception.
The relationship between subjective skill in viewing MESs and objective measures of stereoacuity is not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the predictive value of self-reported MES viewing skill on objective stereoacuity.
To determine if MES skill correlates with the degree of binocular disparity needed for depth perception.

Main Methods:

A study involving 194 individuals assessed self-reported MES skill.
Stereoacuity was measured using a standard clinical test (TNO test).
Correlation and risk analysis were performed between reported MES skill and stereoacuity measures.

Main Results:

Self-reported MES skill was a significant predictor of stereoacuity (r = 0.45, p < 0.0001).
Individuals reporting poor MES skill had a five-fold increased risk of stereo impairment.
Poor MES skill correlated with needing five times greater binocular disparity for depth perception.

Conclusions:

Reported MES skill is a valuable indicator of an individual's stereoacuity.
MES viewing ability may serve as a proxy for clinical stereoacuity assessment.
Further research could explore the mechanisms underlying this relationship.