Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Part II: Basic approach to health screening.

D E Swee1, L Micek-Galinat

  • 1Department of Family Medicine, UMDNJ.

New Jersey Medicine : the Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey
|July 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Responses to questions about the specialty of family practice as a career.

American family physician·1999
Same author

Prostate-specific antigen in black men.

The New England journal of medicine·1997
Same author

Academic-community linkages: community-based training for family physicians.

Family medicine·1996
Same author

Health care system reform and the changing physician-patient relationship.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·1995
Same author

Family practice graduate medical education and hospitals' patient care costs in New Jersey.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1994
Same author

Addressing the spectrum of women's health needs.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·1994
Same journal

Putting the public back in the public health.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·2005
Same journal

Computer as consultants.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·2005
Same journal

Epilepsy in pregnancy.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·2005
Same journal

New regulation for prescriptions.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·2005
Same journal

Paradise lost: the high cost of infertility.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·2005
Same journal

Julie Goldman. The New Jersey medicine interview. Interview by Bill Berlin.

New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey·2005
See all related articles

Physicians should critically evaluate national screening recommendations using disease, test, and population criteria. A framework of six key questions aids in applying screening guidelines to individual patients effectively.

Area of Science:

  • Preventive Medicine
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • National screening recommendations often lack clear application guidelines for individual patients.
  • Physicians may react without full consideration of screening criteria.
  • Effective screening requires careful evaluation of disease, test, and population factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a framework for physicians to critically evaluate and apply national screening recommendations.
  • To guide clinical decision-making regarding patient-specific screening applications.
  • To encourage evidence-based practice in medical screening.

Main Methods:

  • Development of six key questions to assess screening applicability.
  • Evaluation of screening criteria including disease, test, and population characteristics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of patient age, testing frequency, cost-effectiveness, physician practice, setting, and applicability.

    • Main Results:

    • A structured approach using six questions helps physicians personalize screening decisions.
    • Key factors for applying screening include patient demographics, test utility, and resource considerations.
    • Current screening practices can be refined by systematic evaluation.

    Conclusions:

    • Physicians need a systematic approach to avoid arbitrary decisions on screening recommendations.
    • The six-question framework supports evidence-based and patient-centered screening practices.
    • Future research should focus on diverse populations, guideline effectiveness, and new screening technologies.